2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.03.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of a streptavidin-binding aptamer by LNA- and α-l-LNA-substitutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LNAs, which are sugar modified nucleic acid analogues containing a methylene linkage between the 2 0 oxygen and the 4 0 carbon of the ribose ring (Figure 2), display unprecedented hybridization affinity toward complementary DNA (or RNA), enhanced duplex thermal stability, and increased resistance to degradation by nucleases. [29][30][31] As the S2 duplex did not directly participate in binding but was essential for the stabilization of the overall aptamer structure, we introduced LNA modifications in S2, aiming at improving stem stabilization and nuclease resistance while maintaining its binding affinity to the target. When the two distal base pairs of the aptamer βB-1.11 were replaced by LNAs (βB-1.11L1, Table S2), the Δr reached 0.0214 in competitive displacement assay whereas that of βB-1.11 was 0.0195 ( Figure S2), which indicated that the binding affinity of βB-1.11L1 was increased compared with that of βB-1.11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LNAs, which are sugar modified nucleic acid analogues containing a methylene linkage between the 2 0 oxygen and the 4 0 carbon of the ribose ring (Figure 2), display unprecedented hybridization affinity toward complementary DNA (or RNA), enhanced duplex thermal stability, and increased resistance to degradation by nucleases. [29][30][31] As the S2 duplex did not directly participate in binding but was essential for the stabilization of the overall aptamer structure, we introduced LNA modifications in S2, aiming at improving stem stabilization and nuclease resistance while maintaining its binding affinity to the target. When the two distal base pairs of the aptamer βB-1.11 were replaced by LNAs (βB-1.11L1, Table S2), the Δr reached 0.0214 in competitive displacement assay whereas that of βB-1.11 was 0.0195 ( Figure S2), which indicated that the binding affinity of βB-1.11L1 was increased compared with that of βB-1.11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LNAs, which are sugar modified nucleic acid analogues containing a methylene linkage between the 2′ oxygen and the 4′ carbon of the ribose ring (Figure ), display unprecedented hybridization affinity toward complementary DNA (or RNA), enhanced duplex thermal stability, and increased resistance to degradation by nucleases . As the S2 duplex did not directly participate in binding but was essential for the stabilization of the overall aptamer structure, we introduced LNA modifications in S2, aiming at improving stem stabilization and nuclease resistance while maintaining its binding affinity to the target.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, full substitution may not always be necessary to achieve stabilisation: Shi et al (2014) have shown how a DNA aptamer selected to bind lymphoma Ramos cells need not be completely modified with locked nucleic acid (LNA) and a 3 0 3 0 -thymidine cap in order to achieve an approximately ten-fold enhancement in serum stability [7]. Likewise, Jørgensen et al [8] have shown that even partial LNA and a-L-LNA modification of anti-streptavidin DNA aptamers can improve both binding and nuclease resistance.…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Depending on the position, LNA aptamers showed a decreased or comparable biological affinity compared to the unmodified aptamer. Since this report, multiple aptamers such as the (strept)avidin binding aptamer [ 152 , 153 ], the Sgc8 aptamer [ 154 ] and the TD05 aptamer [ 155 ] have been modified with LNA, with a similar result in all cases. In general, the structural changes and biological effects that LNA modifications impose are dependent on the position and number of modifications.…”
Section: Strategies For Improving Binding Affinity Through Chemicamentioning
confidence: 99%