2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-016-0309-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of 3D mean field models for capillarity-driven grain growth based on full field simulations

Abstract: International audienceIn the present study, mean field models of grain growth (Hillert and Burke–Turnbull models) are compared with 3D full field simulations considering an isotropic grain boundary energy and mobility and under the absence of second-phase particles. The present 3D full field simulations are based on a level set description of the grain interfaces within a finite element framework. The digital initial microstructures are generated using a coupled “Voronoï–Laguerre/dense sphere packing” algorith… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…if quality Q mean (N j , N k ) will improve by swapping then 15: [71,72,67,73] or Zener Pinning (ZP) [74,49,50,51]. In [53] isotropic GG was used to compare the TRM model to other approaches (LS-FE [72,25,56]). The base model used to represent this mechanism is commonly known as curvature flow, where the velocity of an interface is proportional to its local mean curvature.…”
Section: Grain Growth Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if quality Q mean (N j , N k ) will improve by swapping then 15: [71,72,67,73] or Zener Pinning (ZP) [74,49,50,51]. In [53] isotropic GG was used to compare the TRM model to other approaches (LS-FE [72,25,56]). The base model used to represent this mechanism is commonly known as curvature flow, where the velocity of an interface is proportional to its local mean curvature.…”
Section: Grain Growth Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level set framework used here for the full field modeling of the microstructure supports implicit description of grain boundaries by level set functions in a FE framework. Initially designed for metallurgic considerations, as microstructure evolutions in industrial processes, this model has already been used in 2D or 3D to simulate dynamic [20] or static [32] recrystallization and grain growth [19,22] with possible inert second phase particles [33] in some metallic materials. As for the phase field approach, the main weakness of this procedure is its computational cost, related to the large number of LS functions needed to describe the microstructure.…”
Section: Level Set Approach For Grain Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where α and n are dependent on initial grain size distribution [19], grain shape or presence of secondary phases, pores or melt [11]. In the case of a monophasic system without pores or melt, values of α and n can be plotted, for log-normal distributions, against the σ µ ratio [19,22]. As an example, α and n are respectively close to 1 2 and 1 (leading to eq.14) for initial grain size distributions which are log-normal with a σ µ ratio equal to 0.45 considering 2D grain growth [19] and may be equal to 0.35 considering 3D grain growth [22].…”
Section: Tracking Grain Growth Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since many decades, phenomenological recrystallization models have been proposed like the well-known Avrami relationship aiming to describe the global recrystallized fraction during hot deformation [7,8,9]. Many years later, new recrystallization models emerged with the intention to implicitly describe the microstructure by considering spherical grains [10,11,12,13,14]. In these models, each physical mechanism is described by a physical or phenomenological law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%