1980
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90427-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement in ventricular function during exercise studied with radionuclide ventriculography after cardiac rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
2

Year Published

1981
1981
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13 before and 0.56 ± 0.16 after training). There are several differences between the study by Jensen et al 34 and the present study. In their study, 13 of the 19 patients had had a myocardial infarction, but in nine patients, the infarction occurred more than 6 months before training; measurements were made during supine exercise.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…13 before and 0.56 ± 0.16 after training). There are several differences between the study by Jensen et al 34 and the present study. In their study, 13 of the 19 patients had had a myocardial infarction, but in nine patients, the infarction occurred more than 6 months before training; measurements were made during supine exercise.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…A beneficial response to exercise was found by Letac et al [11], Conn et al [20], Verani et al [21], Leeet al [22], Jensen et al [23], Williams et al [24], Nagle and Murray [25], Tavazzi et al [17], Sullivan et al [26], Ehsani et al [27], and others [ 10]. In some of these studies [23] improvements of left ven tricular function were observed after a train ing period of 6-12 months.…”
Section: Lack O F Correlation and Training Effectmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is likely that HDL was prevented from rising above control levels by the altered dietary composition. A [31][32][33] Since coronary artery disease may progress considerably within an observation period, recruitment of a comparable control group was essential in this study. These patients probably received closer medical attention than regular patients not participating in a study; this assumption is supported by the fact that TGs decreased significantly in this group, which was probably secondary to repeated dietary advice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%