2010
DOI: 10.1271/bbb.90827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement in theIn VivoDigestibility of Rice Protein by Alkali Extraction Is Due to Structural Changes in Prolamin/Protein Body-I Particle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
33
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The GI transit of rice in rats was monitored as reported previously (6). The GI tract contents were collected at 2 h after the start of feeding of the experimental diets (4 g).…”
Section: Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The GI transit of rice in rats was monitored as reported previously (6). The GI tract contents were collected at 2 h after the start of feeding of the experimental diets (4 g).…”
Section: Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDS-PAGE and Western blotting (WB) analysis were performed as reported previously (6). The samples were suspended in a sample buffer (0.125 m Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 4% w/v SDS, 5% v/v 2-mercaptoethanol, 8 m urea, and 0.2 mg/mL bromophenol blue).…”
Section: Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alkali treatment is considered to break some of the hydrogen, amide, and disulfide bonds in rice glutelin, leading to the reduction in molecular size of protein and the improvement in protein extraction (Hamada, 1997). Recently, it has been reported that this method improves in vitro and in vivo digestibility of rice protein, which is associated with the modification of protein body structure and amino acid composition (Kumaga et al, 2006;Kubota et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2012). Unfortunately, exposing protein to severe alkaline conditions may cause some undesirable side reactions, degradation of protein, and potential toxicity, such as lysinoalanine, resulting in the loss of nutritional value (Shewry and Miflin, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%