2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement in Sagittal Balance After Decompression Surgery without Fusion in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis: Clinical and Radiographic Results at 1 Year

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of 18 studies, three failed to produce the data needed for the meta-synthesis [27][28][29]. Thus, the quantitative meta-analysis was performed on 15 studies [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. LSS had been used as an inclusion criterion in 15 studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 18 studies, three failed to produce the data needed for the meta-synthesis [27][28][29]. Thus, the quantitative meta-analysis was performed on 15 studies [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. LSS had been used as an inclusion criterion in 15 studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, restoration of spinal balance, especially spino-pelvic sagittal balance in patients undergoing lumbar fixation, is of crucial importance [1,2]. However, only a few studies have reported the effects of pedicle screw insertion for spino-pelvic sagittal balance in lumbar fracture cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have demonstrated that PI plays a critical role in the overall alignment of the spine, and influences other sagittal spinal parameters, specifically, lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) [1][2][3]. Indeed, sagittal spinopelvic alignment has become increasingly important for investigating preoperative planning and surgical outcomes in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases [4][5][6]. Failure to account for sagittal spinopelvic alignment might increase the risk of spinal misalignment and lead to poor clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%