2017
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2017.1330542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement and comparative assessment of a hydrological modelling approach on 20 catchments of various sizes under different climate conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[35] compared the performance of nine lumped models and concluded that ModHyPMA is the most appropriate model for the application of this model in the Mékrou catchment. Schematic structure of (a) ModHyPMA [33]; (b) HBV [36]; (c) AWBM [37]; and (d) SimHyd [37]. Figure 3.…”
Section: O Modhypmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[35] compared the performance of nine lumped models and concluded that ModHyPMA is the most appropriate model for the application of this model in the Mékrou catchment. Schematic structure of (a) ModHyPMA [33]; (b) HBV [36]; (c) AWBM [37]; and (d) SimHyd [37]. Figure 3.…”
Section: O Modhypmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of TX is obtained by calibration. ModHyPMA is quite new and has been used for several Benin basins with better results than those of 'Génie Rural à 4 paramètres Journaliers' (GR4J) and HBV [32][33][34]. Ref.…”
Section: O Modhypmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations