2015
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2015.05.0200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Corn following Soybean in Irrigated Sandy Loams

Abstract: Abbreviations: C1, first-year corn; C2, second-year corn; CC, continuous corn; CS, cornsoybean rotation; DNM, difference in nitrogen rates at maximum yield; FRV, fertilizer replacement value; HI, harvest index; NHI, nitrogen harvest index; NRE, nitrogen recovery efficiency; NUE, nitrogen use efficiency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4) similar to other N response studies (Attia et al, 2015;Hatfield and Prueger, 2001). In contrast with 20 kg P ha -1 , AFNR g was 64% at 45 kg N ha -1 , linearly decreasing to 35% as N rate increased to 224 kg N ha -1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…4) similar to other N response studies (Attia et al, 2015;Hatfield and Prueger, 2001). In contrast with 20 kg P ha -1 , AFNR g was 64% at 45 kg N ha -1 , linearly decreasing to 35% as N rate increased to 224 kg N ha -1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The states were: Arkansas, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, North Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Raw data from many sources (Freeborn et al, 2001;Wortmann et al, 2012;Attia et al, 2015;Staton et al, 2011Staton et al, -2016Orlowski et al, 2016;Mourtzinis et al, 2017) as well as several sources of previously unpublished data were included in our analysis. The resultant database consisted of 5991 plot-specific yield data derived from a total of 207 environments (experiment × year).…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for every site-year by crop combination, there were six unique RGY calculated for P and K. The RGY calculation uses the treatment combinations within each fertilizer P or K rate group (0×, 1×, or 2×) to obtain multiple RGY for each site-year, an approach that differs from calculating RGY as the control yield relative to the yield of a maximum, or yield maximizing fertilizer rate (Dodd and Mallarino, 2005;Clover and Mallarino, 2013). The Cate-Nelson procedure (Cate and Nelson, 1971;Attia et al, 2015;Appelhans et al, 2016) was used to evaluate soil and tissue concentrations of P and K in relation to the RGY of corn and soybean with the "rcompanion" package (Mangiafico, 2017) of R (R Core Team, 2015). Soil and tissue test trends that developed over 9 yr were evaluated using a regression analysis in R and significance of the linear model was evaluated at P ≤ 0.05.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%