2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Woodbury Solution Method for Nonlinear Analysis with High-Rank Modifications Based on a Sparse Approximation Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40 Thus, in each step, only small number of entries in these two matrices corresponding to the inelastic DOFs that are newly activated in the current step should be calculated, so that the complete recalculation of these two matrices is not required. 40,43,48 From the above illustration, it can be seen that the main computational cost of the Woodbury formula invests only in the factorization of the small-dimensional Schur complement matrix instead of the recalculation and factorization of the large-dimensional global stiffness matrix. This is actually the main source of the highly efficient computational capacity of the Woodbury formula for local material nonlinear problems.…”
Section: Presentation Of the Woodbury Solution Methods For Local Mate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…40 Thus, in each step, only small number of entries in these two matrices corresponding to the inelastic DOFs that are newly activated in the current step should be calculated, so that the complete recalculation of these two matrices is not required. 40,43,48 From the above illustration, it can be seen that the main computational cost of the Woodbury formula invests only in the factorization of the small-dimensional Schur complement matrix instead of the recalculation and factorization of the large-dimensional global stiffness matrix. This is actually the main source of the highly efficient computational capacity of the Woodbury formula for local material nonlinear problems.…”
Section: Presentation Of the Woodbury Solution Methods For Local Mate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the local material nonlinearity in the structure, the value of m can be much smaller than the dimension of the global stiffness of structure n (i.e., m << n ). Through the condensing of the inelastic DOFs in Equation (), the following relation can be derived 39,40 : Ken×nKn×m0.33emboldKp1m×m0.33emboldKTm×ntruenormalΔboldXn×1=truenormalΔboldFn×1…”
Section: Presentation Of the Woodbury Solution Methods For Local Mate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When utilizing the SBFEM developed by Wolf and Song (2000) and Song and Wolf (2000) to investigate the structural responses of plates (Man et al, 2012, 2013, 2014; Xiang et al, 2014; Lin et al, 2018; Zhang et al, 2019, 2020a, 2020b), an arbitrary surface parallel with the top-plane is required to be discretized only, which helps to reduce the computational cost and increase the calculation efficiency. Comparing with the FEM (Fu et al, 2020; Li and Yu, 2018; Li et al, 2017a, 2018a, 2018b, 2018d, 2019a, 2020; Yu et al, 2018), the analytical formulations of the stiffness matrix along the thickness direction can be given out. Owing to these unique characteristics of the semi-analytical scheme and only discretization of the boundary, the SBFEM has been adopted in many engineering fields, such as modelling both the unbounded and bounded domains (Bazyar and Song, 2008; Birk et al, 2012; Chen et al, 2014; Song, 2009), voided materials (Sladek et al, 2015, 2016), parametrization (Arioli et al, 2019), weak discontinuities (Natarajan et al, 2020), the interaction of acoustic-structures (Li et al, 2018c; Liu et al, 2019b), uniform beams (Li et al, 2017b), cylindrical shells (Li et al, 2019b), and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%