2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved wet path delays for all ESA and reference altimetric missions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, variance is very sensitive to noisy or extreme data values and this can only be overcome by using appropriate criteria for removing those values. This approach has been adopted in this study by applying to the SLA values the standard rejection criteria for example for the acceptable maximum and minimum values for the SLA and for the various range and geophysical corrections used in the SLA computation [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, variance is very sensitive to noisy or extreme data values and this can only be overcome by using appropriate criteria for removing those values. This approach has been adopted in this study by applying to the SLA values the standard rejection criteria for example for the acceptable maximum and minimum values for the SLA and for the various range and geophysical corrections used in the SLA computation [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a coastal-improved path delay algorithm can reduce the WTC error near the coastline up to 1.5 cm, when applied on the Advanced Microwave Radiometer (AMR) of Jason-2 [26]. Another method to improve the WTC in the coastal regions is the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) derived Path Delay (GPD) algorithm, which is based on the combination of wet path delays derived from GNSS, valid MWR measurements and tropospheric delays from atmospheric models [27,28]. In addition, local models are also needed to improve global ocean tide models, which in general possess large errors near the coast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable contributions include the improved algorithm proposed by Brown (2010) and applied to the advanced microwave radiometer on the Jason-2 mission, with an estimated error less than 1.2 cm within 5 km from land. Another successful improvement is the GPD correction by Fernandes et al (2015), built by combining passive microwave measurements from altimetric missions with path delays measured by a network of coastal GNSS stations, and being extended to include measurements from other imaging microwave radiometers. This has been applied globally to 8 missions in the ESA Sea Level CCI project and has yielded a significant impact on regional sea level trends with particular relevance to the coastal and polar regions, due to an efficient correction for land and ice contamination in the radiometer footprint (Fernandes et al 2015).…”
Section: Strategies For Improving the Coastal Altimetry Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another successful improvement is the GPD correction by Fernandes et al (2015), built by combining passive microwave measurements from altimetric missions with path delays measured by a network of coastal GNSS stations, and being extended to include measurements from other imaging microwave radiometers. This has been applied globally to 8 missions in the ESA Sea Level CCI project and has yielded a significant impact on regional sea level trends with particular relevance to the coastal and polar regions, due to an efficient correction for land and ice contamination in the radiometer footprint (Fernandes et al 2015). The impact of the wet tropospheric correction in the coastal zone is well illustrated by Fig.…”
Section: Strategies For Improving the Coastal Altimetry Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple but effective approach is to extrapolate a model-based correction (using for example atmospheric reanalyses from the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, ECMWF) but the corresponding spatial resolution is relatively low for coastal applications. Other approaches include an improved radiometer-based correction accounting for the land contamination effect [26], or the computation of GNSS-derived Path Delay (GPD, [27]). Since the GPD has not been included in the current versions of the three coastal products analyzed here, we used the decontaminated radiometer solution provided in PISTACH.…”
Section: Choice Of the Geophysical Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%