Abstract:Purpose:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery in terms of shortening the surgical time and reducing the use of pupil expansion devices in eyes with iris challenges.
Methods:
This was a retrospective case series of a university hospital. Four hundred forty-three eyes of 433 consecutive patients who underwent illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery were included in this study. Cases with preoperative… Show more
“…1, see Additional le 1, which demonstrated the phaco-chop with illuminated chopper). [16][17][18][19][20] Cataract surgery in phacovitrectomy was performed after 25 gauge 3-port trocar cannula insertion. In cases of increased posterior pressure due to retrobulbar anesthesia, minimal core vitrectomy was performed before cataract surgery.…”
Background To compare the intraoperative challenges, complications, and operation time of illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery between cataract surgery only and phacovitrectomy in eyes with diabetic retinopathy.Methods One university hospital, retrospective case series. Two hundred ninety-five eyes of 295 consecutive patients with diabetic retinopathy who underwent cataract surgery only or phacovitrectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Intraoperative challenges and complications of cataract surgery were thoroughly analyzed by 3D viewing of digitally recorded videos. The pupil diameter, operation time, and improved efficacy (100/operation time × pupil diameter) were compared between the cataract surgery only and phacovitrectomy groups. Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were performed for statistical analysis.Results Of the 295 eyes, 211 underwent cataract surgery only, and 84 underwent phacovitrectomy. Intraoperative challenges such as small pupil, miosis, or poor red reflex occurred more frequently (46 [21.8%] vs. 28 [33.3%], p = 0.029); pupil diameter was smaller (7.34 ± 0.94 vs. 6.89 ± 0.88 mm, p < 0.001) in the phacovitrectomy group than in the cataract surgery only group; however, rates of posterior capsule rupture and operation time were not different between the two groups (0 [0%] vs. 1 [1.2%], p = 0.285; 16.54 ± 2.65 vs. 16.31 ± 4.30 min, p = 0.434). Improved efficacy was higher in the phacovitrectomy group (0.85 ± 0.18 vs. 0.97 ± 0.28, p = 0.002).Conclusions The use of an illuminated chopper is a potential solution for diabetic cataract surgery, particularly in phacovitrectomy, by decreasing the use of supplemental devices, operation time, and posterior capsule rupture.Trial registration: retrospectively registered.
“…1, see Additional le 1, which demonstrated the phaco-chop with illuminated chopper). [16][17][18][19][20] Cataract surgery in phacovitrectomy was performed after 25 gauge 3-port trocar cannula insertion. In cases of increased posterior pressure due to retrobulbar anesthesia, minimal core vitrectomy was performed before cataract surgery.…”
Background To compare the intraoperative challenges, complications, and operation time of illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery between cataract surgery only and phacovitrectomy in eyes with diabetic retinopathy.Methods One university hospital, retrospective case series. Two hundred ninety-five eyes of 295 consecutive patients with diabetic retinopathy who underwent cataract surgery only or phacovitrectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Intraoperative challenges and complications of cataract surgery were thoroughly analyzed by 3D viewing of digitally recorded videos. The pupil diameter, operation time, and improved efficacy (100/operation time × pupil diameter) were compared between the cataract surgery only and phacovitrectomy groups. Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were performed for statistical analysis.Results Of the 295 eyes, 211 underwent cataract surgery only, and 84 underwent phacovitrectomy. Intraoperative challenges such as small pupil, miosis, or poor red reflex occurred more frequently (46 [21.8%] vs. 28 [33.3%], p = 0.029); pupil diameter was smaller (7.34 ± 0.94 vs. 6.89 ± 0.88 mm, p < 0.001) in the phacovitrectomy group than in the cataract surgery only group; however, rates of posterior capsule rupture and operation time were not different between the two groups (0 [0%] vs. 1 [1.2%], p = 0.285; 16.54 ± 2.65 vs. 16.31 ± 4.30 min, p = 0.434). Improved efficacy was higher in the phacovitrectomy group (0.85 ± 0.18 vs. 0.97 ± 0.28, p = 0.002).Conclusions The use of an illuminated chopper is a potential solution for diabetic cataract surgery, particularly in phacovitrectomy, by decreasing the use of supplemental devices, operation time, and posterior capsule rupture.Trial registration: retrospectively registered.
“…1, see Videos, Additional le 1 and 2, which demonstrates the phaco chop with illuminated chopper). [17,18] Sub-Tenon anaesthesia was administered using 0.5-1.0 mL of lidocaine 2.0%. Neither intracameral epinephrine nor lidocaine was administered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in cataract surgery involving iris challenges, the use of the illuminated chopper could improve surgical eld visibility and reduce the requirement for additional use of a pupil expansion device. [13,17] (2) Creating a capsulorhexis is di cult in eyes without a su cient red re ex. Thus, few staining methods have been used to visualize the anterior capsule.…”
Section: Cme Cystoid Macular Edemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the illuminated chopper could reduce the use of pupil expansion devices, iris manipulation, operation time, and eventually CME. [5,6,17] This study was limited by its single-surgeon retrospective design, which may have resulted in bias in the outcome analyses. Further prospective studies should be conducted regarding the advantages associated with the illuminated chopper compared to those of the conventional tool.…”
Section: Cme Cystoid Macular Edemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). [17,18] It is a blunt chopper that is ideal for horizontal but not for vertical chopping. In this large sample-based cohort of cataract surgeries using an illuminated chopper, we evaluated the use of mechanical pupil dilation or capsule staining, operative time, complications, and visual outcomes.…”
Background: To evaluate the use of mechanical pupil dilation and capsule staining, and the rate of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and cystoid macular oedema (CME) in illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery.
Methods: One university hospital, retrospective non-randomized consecutive case series. Six hundred forty-eight eyes of 648 consecutive patients who underwent illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery were included in this study. The use of iris hooks and capsule staining, pupil size, operation time, and complications (PCR and CME) were evaluated.
Results: In 39 of the 648 eyes (6.6%), the red reflex was insufficient for safe cataract surgery. Of 39 eyes, iris hooks and capsule staining were used in 7 (1.08%) and 1 (0.15%), respectively, while even without any iris hooks or capsule staining, illuminated chopper-assisted capsulorhexis was safely performed in 31 (4.78%) eyes. The rates of PCR and clinically significant CME were 0% (0/648 eyes) and 4.1% (26/648 eyes), respectively.
Conclusion: Not only the use of mechanical pupil dilation and capsule staining but also PCR and CME were very low in illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery.
Trial registration: retrospectively registered.
Background
To compare the intraoperative challenges, complications, and operation time of illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery between cataract surgery only and phacovitrectomy in eyes with diabetic retinopathy.
Methods
One university hospital, retrospective case series. Two hundred ninety-five eyes of 295 consecutive patients with diabetic retinopathy who underwent cataract surgery only or phacovitrectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Intraoperative challenges and complications of cataract surgery were thoroughly analyzed by 3D viewing of digitally recorded videos. The pupil diameter, operation time, and improved efficacy (100/operation time × pupil diameter) were compared between the cataract surgery only and phacovitrectomy groups.
Results
Of the 295 eyes, 211 underwent cataract surgery only, and 84 underwent phacovitrectomy. Intraoperative challenges such as small pupil, miosis, or poor red reflex occurred more frequently (46 [21.8%] vs. 28 [33.3%], p = 0.029); pupil diameter was smaller (7.34 ± 0.94 vs. 6.89 ± 0.88 mm, p < 0.001) in the phacovitrectomy group than in the cataract surgery only group; however, rates of posterior capsule rupture and operation time were not different between the two groups (0 [0%] vs. 1 [1.2%], p = 0.285; 16.54 ± 2.65 vs. 16.31 ± 4.30 min, p = 0.434). Improved efficacy was higher in the phacovitrectomy group (0.85 ± 0.18 vs. 0.97 ± 0.28, p = 0.002).
Conclusions
The use of an illuminated chopper is a potential solution for diabetic cataract surgery, particularly in phacovitrectomy, by decreasing the use of supplemental devices, operation time, and posterior capsule rupture.
Trial registration
Retrospectively registered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.