49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-1241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Validation Methodology for Missile Datcom Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It gives very fast and accurate enough results for the initial design phase [18][19][20]. Detailed verification of DATCOM methods are also studied in the literature [21,24,25]. To conclude, Digital DATCOM program is considered as an effective way to estimate the wing-body aerodynamics with acceptable accuracy since the main focus of the study is not detailed aerodynamic modeling.…”
Section: Forward Flight Aerodynamic Model: Wing-body Aerodynamics At ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It gives very fast and accurate enough results for the initial design phase [18][19][20]. Detailed verification of DATCOM methods are also studied in the literature [21,24,25]. To conclude, Digital DATCOM program is considered as an effective way to estimate the wing-body aerodynamics with acceptable accuracy since the main focus of the study is not detailed aerodynamic modeling.…”
Section: Forward Flight Aerodynamic Model: Wing-body Aerodynamics At ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical calculations of aerodynamic characteristics of the original, 2M, 2T, and 2F models, performed using the CFD methods prior to the wind tunnel test campaign, were necessary in order to estimate the expected loads on the wind tunnel model. The numerical calculation was done in the FLUENT package, as it allows calculation of the aerodynamic characteristics of complex aerodynamic shapes [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The solid model of the missile is done in INVENTOR software.…”
Section: The Cfd Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental, empirical, and computational approaches were compared in a huge body of studies. Empirical and experimental approaches were compared in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] whereas in [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], computational results were compared with experimental measurements. Computational techniques were also compared with empirical ones in [23].Comparative studies aggregating the three approaches were only conducted by Rosema el al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%