2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.113.231101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Upper Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from 2009–2010 LIGO and Virgo Data

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
90
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2014):The bounds for are (Aasi et al. 2014, 2015):We note that the bound for the frequency band comes from a correlation analysis using the colocated 2 km and 4 km Hanford detectors (Aasi et al. 2015).…”
Section: Prospects For Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2014):The bounds for are (Aasi et al. 2014, 2015):We note that the bound for the frequency band comes from a correlation analysis using the colocated 2 km and 4 km Hanford detectors (Aasi et al. 2015).…”
Section: Prospects For Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backgrounds from pulsars, magnetars, core-collapse supernovae, and various physical processes in the early universe are all possible as well [4][5][6], but their expected amplitudes are not as well constrained as the expected background due to compact binary coalescences. The potential for the contamination of searches for a SGWB is strong due to potential correlated environmental noise between detectors [5,[7][8][9][10][11], which would result in a systematic error in the searches. A related concern exists in searches for transient sources of gravitational waves, such as due to correlated magnetic transients from storms [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Initial LIGO 6 and initial Virgo 7 have used this method on their data to set upper limits on the energy density of the SGWB. [8][9][10] No signal was detected, but the results constrain the energy density of the SGWB to be Ω 0 < 5.6 × 10 −6 at 95% confidence 10 in the 41.5-169.25 Hz band. The advanced detectors are expected to ultimately have about 10-times better strain sensitivity than the initial detectors; the low frequency limit of the sensitive band is also extended from 40 Hz down to 10 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%