2000
DOI: 10.1049/ip-com:20000826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved union bounds on turbo codes performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A generalization of the Viterbi & Viterbi bound for imperfect CSI is considered in [16]. Again, this is problematic as the technique relies on the arguments of [15], when now H is replaced by the one corresponding to imperfect CSI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A generalization of the Viterbi & Viterbi bound for imperfect CSI is considered in [16]. Again, this is problematic as the technique relies on the arguments of [15], when now H is replaced by the one corresponding to imperfect CSI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our reservation stems from the fact that the Viterbi & Viterbi bounding technique [14] is invalidated once the parameter H = exp(− Es N 0 ) (in the AWGN case) is replaced by H in [15], Eq. (12), for the fast Rician fading channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation