2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.05.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved T−ψ nodal finite element schemes for eddy current problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, we can find some papers related to the numerical analysis of the three-dimensional timedependent eddy current model in bounded domains containing conducting and dielectric materials [1,5,11,19,20,24]. Most of these articles deal with the case where the conducting materials are strictly contained in the computational domain and the source current is imposed in an inner subdomain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, we can find some papers related to the numerical analysis of the three-dimensional timedependent eddy current model in bounded domains containing conducting and dielectric materials [1,5,11,19,20,24]. Most of these articles deal with the case where the conducting materials are strictly contained in the computational domain and the source current is imposed in an inner subdomain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the conductors are multiply connected, the potential 1jJ may not be unique in the nonconductive region [8], and some special procedures need to ensure the 1jJ unique. In [5], a new T -1jJ finite element decoupled scheme only for the simply connected eddy current problem has been developed, which makes further reduction of computational cost and avoids saddle-point equations system. The aim of this paper is to extend the T -1jJ decoupled scheme with Crank-Nicholson difference format to solve the multiply connected eddy current problem.…”
Section: T-1jj Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupled scheme (21)-(22) has been discussed in [5]. We alter the indices of time of the second term in the second formulation of (22) to obtain a novel discrete decoupled scheme for (15) as follows:…”
Section: T-1jj Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, we refer to Alonso Rodrígiez , where the authors give a scalar potential‐based approach to eddy current problems. Several papers devote to numerical analysis of this method . The employment of the magnetic scalar potential ψ in nonconductive domain instead of the magnetic vector potential A in the A ‐ ϕ formulation brings a substantial reduction of computational cost by decreasing the degrees of freedom per node from three to one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The employment of the magnetic scalar potential ψ in nonconductive domain instead of the magnetic vector potential A in the A ‐ ϕ formulation brings a substantial reduction of computational cost by decreasing the degrees of freedom per node from three to one. In , a new T ‐ ψ finite element decoupled scheme only for eddy current problem with a simply connected conductor has been developed. However, some problems arise when the conductors are multiply‐connected; the potential ψ e may not be unique in the nonconductive region , where we denote the scalar magnetic potential outside the conductors as ψ e to differentiate from ψ in the simply connected case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%