The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved subband-forward algorithm for acoustic noise reduction and speech quality enhancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we present the forward blind source separation (BSS) structure and we give its full formulation and optimal solutions in the time-domain. This structure is intensively used in acoustic noise cancellation [10,[16][17][18][19]. The two-channel forward BSS structure is presented in Figure 2.At the output of this structure, the…”
Section: Ii2 Two-channel Forward Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we present the forward blind source separation (BSS) structure and we give its full formulation and optimal solutions in the time-domain. This structure is intensively used in acoustic noise cancellation [10,[16][17][18][19]. The two-channel forward BSS structure is presented in Figure 2.At the output of this structure, the…”
Section: Ii2 Two-channel Forward Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, speech enhancement has been widely used in the fields of speech analysis, speech recognition, speech communication, and so forth. The aim of speech enhancement is to recover and improve the speech quality and its intelligibility via different techniques and algorithms, like unsupervised methods including spectral subtraction [1,2], Wiener filtering [3], statistical model-based estimation [4,5], subband forward algorithm [6], subspace method [5,7], and so on. Generally these unsupervised methods are based on statistical signal processing and typically work in the frequency domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performances are evaluated by considering an IEEE corpus, the GRID audio-visual corpus, and different types of noises. The proposed approach significantly improves objective speech quality and intelligibility and outperforms the conventional STFT-NMF, DWPT-NMF, and DNN-IRM methods.Keywords: Dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DTCWT); discrete wavelet packet transform (DWPT); stationary wavelet transform (SWT); speech enhancement (SE) 2 of 18 estimation [5], sparseness and temporal gradient regularization method [6], Wiener filtering [7], subband forward algorithm [8], and subspace method [9]. These methods consist of two parts: Noise tracking and signal gain estimation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keywords: Dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DTCWT); discrete wavelet packet transform (DWPT); stationary wavelet transform (SWT); speech enhancement (SE) 2 of 18 estimation [5], sparseness and temporal gradient regularization method [6], Wiener filtering [7], subband forward algorithm [8], and subspace method [9]. These methods consist of two parts: Noise tracking and signal gain estimation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%