Improved Streamflow Forecasting and Flood Warning Using Variational Mode Decomposition and Extreme Gradient Boosting

Elkurdy, Mostafa; Binns, Andrew D.; Gharabaghi, Bahram

doi:10.1130/abs/2020am-359484

Geological Society of America Abstracts With Programs

2020

DOI: 10.1130/abs/2020am-359484

|View full text |Cite

Improved Streamflow Forecasting and Flood Warning Using Variational Mode Decomposition and Extreme Gradient Boosting

Mostafa Elkurdy¹,

Andrew D. Binns²,

Bahram Gharabaghi³

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ni, et al[7] determined that XGBoost is better than SVM in streamflow prediction. Elkurdy, et al[22] combine the prediction Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) and XGBoost models in daily streamflow in the Bow River (Alberta, Canada). As a result, it has been determined that the hybrid VMD-XGBoost model exhibits very high prediction success.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Data division effect on machine learning performance for prediction of streamflow

Katipoğlu

2022

DÜMF MD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Accurate estimation of streamflow has an important role in water resources management, disaster preparedness and early warning, reservoir operation, and sizing of water structures. In this study, Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) algorithms are used for the estimation of streamflow. In order to reveal the appropriate model, the raw model and models with optimized parameters were evaluated while the models were being built. In the setup of the models, various training test rates were also tried, and it was investigated which data division showed more effective results. For this purpose, the data were divided into ratios such as 60-40, 70-30, 80-20, and 90-10, respectively, and the model results were compared. Various statistical indicators such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Coefficient of Determination (R2) were used when comparing the models. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the most suitable model for monthly streamflow estimation was obtained by using the optimized Xgboost algorithm and 60-40% data division. The obtained outputs constitute a vital resource for decision-makers regarding water resources planning and flood and drought management.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Data division effect on machine learning performance for prediction of streamflow

Katipoğlu

2022

DÜMF MD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Improved Streamflow Forecasting and Flood Warning Using Variational Mode Decomposition and Extreme Gradient Boosting

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Data division effect on machine learning performance for prediction of streamflow

Data division effect on machine learning performance for prediction of streamflow

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About