2016
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1145367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved statistics of sub-mesoscale eddies in the Baltic Sea retrieved from SAR imagery

Abstract: In the present article the spatio-temporal distribution of submesoscale eddies seen in Envisat Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) imagery of the Baltic Sea is discussed. A total of 1250 ASAR images acquired between 2009 and 2011 form the basis of our studies and show imprints of almost 7000 sub-mesoscale eddies. Since the visibility of vortical structures in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery significantly depends on the nearsurface wind speed, wind data from a numerical model of the Baltic Sea were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon the preprocessing step, every image was visually inspected at full resolution in search of eddy signatures described above and exemplified in Figure . Then by looking at eddy boundaries outlined due to accumulation of slicks, floating ice, or enhanced wave breaking, their location, diameter, vorticity sign, and manifestation type were defined manually, similarly as what was done, for example, in Dokken and Wahl (), Karimova (), Karimova and Gade (), and Atadzhanova et al (). All detected eddies were then split into two major groups—those identified over open‐water regions (hereinafter, open‐water (OW) eddies) and eddies manifested owing to spatial redistribution of drifting ice floes near the ice edge and in the marginal ice zone (hereinafter, MIZ eddies).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon the preprocessing step, every image was visually inspected at full resolution in search of eddy signatures described above and exemplified in Figure . Then by looking at eddy boundaries outlined due to accumulation of slicks, floating ice, or enhanced wave breaking, their location, diameter, vorticity sign, and manifestation type were defined manually, similarly as what was done, for example, in Dokken and Wahl (), Karimova (), Karimova and Gade (), and Atadzhanova et al (). All detected eddies were then split into two major groups—those identified over open‐water regions (hereinafter, open‐water (OW) eddies) and eddies manifested owing to spatial redistribution of drifting ice floes near the ice edge and in the marginal ice zone (hereinafter, MIZ eddies).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way spiral eddies can form is through ageostrophic baroclinic instability associated with a background horizontal density gradient; and theoretical studies [21] show such eddies to have cyclonic vorticity and a spiral diameter D = 2 R d , where R d = (g ∆ρ/ρ H) 1/2 / f is the baroclinic deformation radius. Analysis of SAR spirals in the Baltic, Black, and Caspian seas shows that nearly all the spirals have a morphology consistent with cyclonic vorticity [19,20], a diameter proportional to R d [20], and are statistically associated with lateral density gradients [20]. Our analysis explicitly reveals the cyclonic vorticity, and based on the available measurements of water stratification, we estimate a value of R d~3 .7 km, which is close to a climatological value of 3.9 km near the study site [22].…”
Section: Spiral Pattern (Band 3 Data)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery, at wind speeds of 0.2 to 5.6 m s −1 , the spiral arms would appear as relative dark streaks because of the wave-damping effect of algae-derived surface films. Sub-mesoscale eddies are thus manifested in SAR imagery as "black" spirals [19]. In the Baltic Sea, such black eddies have a mean diameter D = 6.4 km (s.d.…”
Section: Spiral Pattern (Band 3 Data)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His eddy definition is based on the detection of isolated anomalies in pressure. Karimova and Gade (2016) detected around 7000 sub-mesoscale eddies in the entire Baltic Sea based on SAR images between 2009 and 2010. However, even these Karimova and Gade (2016) cannot directly be compared to ours.…”
Section: Eddies In the Western Baltic Seamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, features like the size of eddies, their sense of rotation, Rossby number or propagation distance can be important. Several studies investigated these features for the global ocean (e.g., Chelton et al, 2011;Petersen et al, 2013) as well as for smaller regions like the southern New England shelf (Kirincich, 2016), the California Bight (Kurian et al, 2011;Dong et al, 2012), the South China Sea (Xiu et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2011), the Mediterranean Outflow (Aguiar et al, 2013), or the Baltic Sea (Reißmann, 2005;Karimova and Gade, 2016). Yet, McGillicuddy (2016) addressed the effect of these features on biological processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%