1968
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.173.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Stark Profile Calculations for the Hydrogen LinesHα,Hβ,Hγ, and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
120
0
4

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
120
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrogen lines profile is well described by Kepple and Griem [54,67]. The Stark broadening is mainly due to the ions, its form is linear and the resulting shape is more complex than a Lorentzian profile when the dynamics of the ions is considered.…”
Section: -Stark Broadeningmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Hydrogen lines profile is well described by Kepple and Griem [54,67]. The Stark broadening is mainly due to the ions, its form is linear and the resulting shape is more complex than a Lorentzian profile when the dynamics of the ions is considered.…”
Section: -Stark Broadeningmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…That the orbital angular momentum states of hydrogen labeled by the quantum number, l, are not degenerate in the presence of an electric field perturbation is described by the well-known Stark effect (e.g., Kepple & Griem 1968;Vidal et al 1971;Seaton 1990). In stellar atmospheres, this perturbation is due to a net electric microfield from fluctuations Temperature as a function of column mass for loop models generated using the XEUV backwarming method described here (black), using the XEUV technique of A05 (green), and without XEUV backwarming (red).…”
Section: Line Broadeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it differs slightly between calculations. The halfwidth α 1/2 of the H β line (approximately 0.085) is plotted as a function of temperature (density) for several representative densities (temperatures) in figures 4(a) and (b) according to the Gigosos-Cardeñoso (GC) theory [20] and according to the Kepple-Griem (KG) theory [19], showing a slight discrepancy between the two theories. The uncertainty in α 1/2 introduces an error <20% in density estimation for our hydrogen plasma jets.…”
Section: Uncertainty In Stark Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The half-width α 1/2 has been tabulated for many hydrogen lines based on both theoretical calculations and experimental data for the temperature range 0.5-4 eV and density range 10 20-24 m −3 [19,20,22]. The half-width α 1/2 has a weak dependence on density and on temperature.…”
Section: Uncertainty In Stark Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%