2016
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved specificity of hippocampal memory trace labeling

Abstract: Recent studies have focused on the identification and manipulation of memory traces in rodent models. The two main mouse models utilized are either a CreERT2/loxP tamoxifen (TAM)- or a tetracycline transactivator (tTA)/tetracycline-response element (TRE) doxycycline (DOX)-inducible system. These systems, however, could be improved to label a more specific population of activated neurons corresponding to behavior. Here, we sought to identify an improved selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulator (SERM) in which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
37
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the CA3 autoassociative network has been suggested to play a key role in memory storage and recall, especially during pattern completion (Le Duigou et al, 2014; Papp et al, 2007; Rolls, 2013b), we reasoned that CA3b may be most robustly reactivated during recall of a memory trace compared to other CA3 subregions. To test this hypothesis, we used a genetic memory trace strategy to label separately neurons activated during memory encoding and during memory retrieval in the same animals (Cazzulino et al, 2016; Denny et al, 2014). To achieve this, we crossed an ArcCreER T2 mouse line with a Rosa26-CAG-STOP-floxed-ChR2(H134R)-EYFP line.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because the CA3 autoassociative network has been suggested to play a key role in memory storage and recall, especially during pattern completion (Le Duigou et al, 2014; Papp et al, 2007; Rolls, 2013b), we reasoned that CA3b may be most robustly reactivated during recall of a memory trace compared to other CA3 subregions. To test this hypothesis, we used a genetic memory trace strategy to label separately neurons activated during memory encoding and during memory retrieval in the same animals (Cazzulino et al, 2016; Denny et al, 2014). To achieve this, we crossed an ArcCreER T2 mouse line with a Rosa26-CAG-STOP-floxed-ChR2(H134R)-EYFP line.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this, we crossed an ArcCreER T2 mouse line with a Rosa26-CAG-STOP-floxed-ChR2(H134R)-EYFP line. We used a contextual fear conditioning (CFC) paradigm to first tag a strongly labeled memory (Cazzulino et al, 2016; Denny et al, 2014). Mice were injected with 4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), which is required for CreER activity, 5 hours prior to administering the CFC paradigm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, there is significantly more background expression with the H2B-mCherry line than with the eYFP line. Moreover, the concentration and timing of a tamoxifen (TAM)/4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) injection relative to the behavioral experience also produces differences in the labeled populations (Cazzulino et al, 2016). We note these important technical differences because of the following: if an active neuronal population is tagged in a manner that does not recapitulate the endogenous number of active cells in a defined period of time, then the number of tagged cells corresponding to a given experience may produce a diluted percentage.…”
Section: The State Of Immediate Early Gene (Ieg)-based Mouse Models: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of this hypothesis, in DG, CA3 and CA1, exposure to the same context twice elicits an above-chance level of overlap in activity whereas exposure to two different contexts elicits either below chance-level overlap, chance-level overlap, or above chance-level overlap but at a magnitude lower than exposing an animal to the same context twice (Guzowski et al, 1999; Guzowski, 2002; Satvat et al, 2011; Liu et al, 2012; Deng et al, 2013; Ramirez et al, 2013; Tayler et al, 2013; Denny et al, 2014; Cazzulino et al, 2016). Testing whether or not newly developed tagging strategies can unveil context-specificity in areas downstream of the hippocampus or valence-specificity within cortico-hippocampus circuits remains an exciting area of inquiry, both within and across brain regions (Adhikari et al, 2010; Fanselow and Dong, 2010; Kheirbek et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2013; Ciocchi et al, 2015).…”
Section: But Is It Really a Memory?mentioning
confidence: 99%