2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved specificity and reduced subtype cross-reactivity for antibody detection by ELISA using globular head domain recombinant hemagglutinin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,17 The use of GH HA1 rHAs that lack the antigenically conserved HA stalk can reduce such cross-reactivity. 18 In this study, we observed high MFIs against We have previously demonstrated that cross-reactivity could be reduced by incorporating a serum adsorption step prior to the MAGPIX or MN assays, and the remaining signals from post-adsorption samples represent HA subtype-specific responses. 4,7 Thus, serum adsorptions were performed in the current study to remove cross-reactive antibodies to improve sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Serum Adsorption By Using Either 2 or 8 Rhas From A(h1n1) supporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…16,17 The use of GH HA1 rHAs that lack the antigenically conserved HA stalk can reduce such cross-reactivity. 18 In this study, we observed high MFIs against We have previously demonstrated that cross-reactivity could be reduced by incorporating a serum adsorption step prior to the MAGPIX or MN assays, and the remaining signals from post-adsorption samples represent HA subtype-specific responses. 4,7 Thus, serum adsorptions were performed in the current study to remove cross-reactive antibodies to improve sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Serum Adsorption By Using Either 2 or 8 Rhas From A(h1n1) supporting
confidence: 50%
“…On the other hand, in the S2 sera collected from poultry workers exposed to A(H5N1), MFIs against seasonal H1 and H3 were reduced for both the MN ≥40 and MN <40 groups after 2‐Ads (Figure F,G), but only MN <40 group reached statistically significant difference (Figure G). MFIs against H5.Ind.05 Ecto and H7.NY.16 Ecto domain rHAs in the MN <40 group were significantly reduced after 2‐Ads, but not for antibodies against H5.Ind.05 GH (Figure G), suggesting antibodies against GH HA1 are more strain‐specific, while antibodies against the whole ectodomain containing the HA stalk region are more cross‐reactive …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result of exposure(s) to seasonal influenza viruses and/or vaccine(s), antibodies to novel HA in unexposed populations increases with age and may vary by geographic location . People who were born before 1967 showed significantly higher reactivity against H2 GH HA1 than those born after 1970 ( P <.05) and could not be removed by serum adsorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of exposure(s) to seasonal influenza viruses and/or vaccine(s), antibodies to novel HA in unexposed populations increases with age and may vary by geographic location. 3,[18][19][20][21] People who were born before 1967 showed significantly higher reactivity against H2 GH HA1 than those born after 1970 (P<.05) and could not be removed by serum adsorption. They also showed higher antibody baselines (S1) against other group 1 HAs, such as, pH1, H5 VN, and H9 due to potential exposure to H2N2 virus and more seasonal H1N1 viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%