2019
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved spatial ecological sampling using open data and standardization: an example from malaria mosquito surveillance

Abstract: Vector-borne disease control relies on efficient vector surveillance, mostly carried out using traps whose number and locations are often determined by expert opinion rather than a rigorous quantitative sampling design. In this work we propose a framework for ecological sampling design which in its preliminary stages can take into account environmental conditions obtained from open data (i.e. remote sensing and meteorological stations) not necessarily designed for ecological analysis. These environmental data … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next phase of the Ag1000G Project will expand the resource to cover 18 countries and will include another major malaria vector species, Anopheles arabiensis, and so will address some of these gaps. Looking beyond the Ag1000G Project, genomic surveillance of insecticide resistance will require new sampling frameworks that incorporate spatial and ecological modeling of vector distributions to guide sampling at appropriate spatial scales (Sedda et al 2019). Fortunately, mosquitoes are easy to transport, and the costs of sequencing continue to decrease, so it is reasonable to consider a mixed strategy that includes both whole-genome sequencing and targeted assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next phase of the Ag1000G Project will expand the resource to cover 18 countries and will include another major malaria vector species, Anopheles arabiensis, and so will address some of these gaps. Looking beyond the Ag1000G Project, genomic surveillance of insecticide resistance will require new sampling frameworks that incorporate spatial and ecological modeling of vector distributions to guide sampling at appropriate spatial scales (Sedda et al 2019). Fortunately, mosquitoes are easy to transport, and the costs of sequencing continue to decrease, so it is reasonable to consider a mixed strategy that includes both whole-genome sequencing and targeted assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling points within a region were selected based on multiple criteria. The primary selection criterion was to sample from waterbodies that were representative of the region, including a diversity of wetlands rather than those with the highest catch rates 28 . Additional criteria stipulated that the water bodies were at least 1 km away from one another to avoid sampling mosquitoes from adjacent water bodies, as mean mosquito dispersal distances range from 35 m to 1.4 km 31 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mosquito abundance and composition can also vary across locations and land use types 22 - 27 . However, many comparisons rely on opportunistic sampling across different time periods or targeted sampling at locations to maximize collections 28 , but not always 29 , 30 . Here, we use a paired sampling design to show that human activities beyond climate are strongly associated with high abundances of known vectors across large spatial extents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the locations of entomological sampling sites, we will use a simulation-based approach designed to optimise habitat fragmentation studies 40 . This approach extends commonly used geostatistical survey designs, in which survey locations are positioned to maximise predictive abilities and minimise survey effort by leveraging spatial autocorrelation between survey points 41 , 42 . Geostatistical sampling designs will be adapted to maximise habitat differences between sampling locations by integrating metrics on land cover, fragment size and distance from forest edges 40 .…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%