2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-013-0656-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Sobolev embeddings, profile decomposition, and concentration-compactness for fractional Sobolev spaces

Abstract: We obtain an improved Sobolev inequality in spaces involving Morrey norms. This refinement yields a direct proof of the existence of optimizers and the compactness up to symmetry of optimizing sequences for the usual Sobolev embedding. More generally, it allows to derive an alternative, more transparent proof of the profile decomposition in obtained in G,rard (ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var 3:213-233, 1998) using the abstract approach of dislocation spaces developed in Tintarev and Fieseler (Concentration compac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
191
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(90 reference statements)
2
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, we will have to handle not only the usual nonlocal character of such fractional operators, but also the difficulties given by the corresponding nonlinear behavior. As a consequence, we can make use neither of the powerful framework provided by the Caffarelli-Silvestre s-harmonic extension ( [4]) nor of various tools as, e. g., the sharp 3-commutators estimates introduced in [5] to deduce the regularity of weak fractional harmonic maps, the strong barriers and density estimates in [26,28,29], the commutator and energy estimates in [25,27], and so on. Indeed, the aforementioned tools seem not to be trivially adaptable to a nonlinear framework; also, increasing difficulties are due to the non-Hilbertian structure of the involved fractional Sobolev spaces W s,p when p is different than 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we will have to handle not only the usual nonlocal character of such fractional operators, but also the difficulties given by the corresponding nonlinear behavior. As a consequence, we can make use neither of the powerful framework provided by the Caffarelli-Silvestre s-harmonic extension ( [4]) nor of various tools as, e. g., the sharp 3-commutators estimates introduced in [5] to deduce the regularity of weak fractional harmonic maps, the strong barriers and density estimates in [26,28,29], the commutator and energy estimates in [25,27], and so on. Indeed, the aforementioned tools seem not to be trivially adaptable to a nonlinear framework; also, increasing difficulties are due to the non-Hilbertian structure of the involved fractional Sobolev spaces W s,p when p is different than 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of profile decompositions involving the usual rescalings and shifts was established by Kyriasis [18] Koch [17], Bahouri, Cohen and Koch [5] for imbeddings involving Besov, Triebel-Lizorkin and BMO spaces, although, like all similar work based on the use of wavelet bases, it provided only a weak form of remainder. Related results involving Morrey spaces were obtained recently in [27], using, like here, more classical decompositions of spaces instead of wavelets. We refer the reader for details to the recent survey of profile decompositions, [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Proof Since L α,2 (R N ) is equivalent to H s (R N ), the proof of [29,Lemma 5] carries over with only minor modifications.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Functional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof It suffices to remark that the proof of [29,Lemma 6] actually contains a proof of our statement.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Functional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%