1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02037621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved separation method for determining actinides in soil samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering all the workload involved in the analyses, 16 samples have been proven to be handled within 2 days, which gives rise to a sample throughput of 8 day À1 . Compared with former batch-wise methods 21,22 handling smaller sample amounts (#5 g soil versus #20 g in this work), a better overall sample throughput is still herein achieved.…”
Section: Methods Validation and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering all the workload involved in the analyses, 16 samples have been proven to be handled within 2 days, which gives rise to a sample throughput of 8 day À1 . Compared with former batch-wise methods 21,22 handling smaller sample amounts (#5 g soil versus #20 g in this work), a better overall sample throughput is still herein achieved.…”
Section: Methods Validation and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The detection limits obtained with the SI-TEVA method for 10 g of soil, for example, for 239 Pu, 240 Pu and 237 Np were 1.5 mBq kg À1 , 5.3 mBq kg À1 and 16 mBq kg À1 , respectively, and the dynamic linear ranges of the calibration plots for ICP-MS were in the interval of 11.5-1150 mBq kg À1 , 42.0-4200 mBq kg À1 and 0.13-13.0 mBq kg À1 , respectively. Compared with previous publications in which smaller amounts of samples were processed, [21][22][23] the proposed analytical method yields better enrichment factors and thus improved detection limits and linear ranges of calibration graphs. 6.3.…”
Section: Detection Limit and Linear Range Calibration Graphmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The resin is based on the well known TRUEX-process [11][12][13][14], where a combination of CMPO/TBP in a suitable solvent is used to extract tri-, tetra-, and hexavalent actinides during reprocessing of nuclear fuel. TRU-Resin was originally meant to be used for the decontamination of highly radioactive acid-effluents, but its selectivity for transuranium elements has promoted a wider use, in analysis of soil [15][16][17][18], urine [14,19,20] and faeces [21]. However, despite the high extraction capacity and selectivity for transuranium elements, the use of TRU-Spec in the analysis of Pu in natural waters has so far not been reported in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Of all the transuranium elements, plutonium has been studied most extensively and numerous procedures have been reported for its determination [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], Current techniques for the determination of plutonium trace level are mainly radiochemical methods (a-spectrometry, y spectrometry, liquid scintillation counting) carried out after chemical preparation of the samples. Interest has also tumed to various mass spectrometry techniques (ICP-MS [10,11], TIMS [12,13]), but those methods are not really adapted for a matrix where uranium is the principal constituent because of isobaric interfering effects. Only Resonance Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (RIMS [14]) would authorize plutonium measurement with remaining uranium in the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%