2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved separation and antifouling properties of thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane by the incorporation of cGO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the permeability of the membrane PA TFNC1_5 was up to two orders of magnitude higher than that of lab-made PA TFNC membranes prepared with similar IP conditions [33,34], whereas its separation factor was 21 to 30% lower. The membrane PA TFC_5 exhibited a very similar separation factor (only 1.5% higher α f value) than that of the lab-made PA TFC membranes with 7 to 32% higher permeability [4,5].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Filtration Performance Of Polyester And Pomentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, the permeability of the membrane PA TFNC1_5 was up to two orders of magnitude higher than that of lab-made PA TFNC membranes prepared with similar IP conditions [33,34], whereas its separation factor was 21 to 30% lower. The membrane PA TFC_5 exhibited a very similar separation factor (only 1.5% higher α f value) than that of the lab-made PA TFC membranes with 7 to 32% higher permeability [4,5].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Filtration Performance Of Polyester And Pomentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the main obstacle that restricts the application of membranes in water treatment is membrane fouling, which usually lowers the water productivity, deteriorates membrane separation capability (i.e. reduction of the permeate quality), shortens membrane lifespan and consequently, increases the operation and maintenance costs [1][2][3][4]. Fouling originates from the interaction between a membrane surface and foulant(s), thus, it is strongly influenced by the physicochemical properties of the membrane surface such as pore size and its geometry, charge density, roughness and hydrophilicity [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5][6][7] The main factors affecting membrane fouling are roughness and hydrophilicity, as well as the chemical and physical properties of the feed water. 8,9 The fouling extent of the membrane varies, depending on the structural properties of the membrane. 10,11 In this sense, the incorporation of ller materials in the membrane structure is an appropriate strategy to mitigate the fouling extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Thin-lm composite (TFC) membranes are the most popular commercial NF membranes which usually consist of an ultra-thin selective layer upon the surface of a porous at sheet substrate membrane through the interfacial polymerization (IP) process, using diamine and acyl chlorides. 4,5 However, membrane fouling is a bottleneck for the practical application of NF in water and wastewater treatment. Fouling usually causes a signicant loss of productivity and increased operational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%