2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved sensitivity and microvascular weighting of 3T laminar fMRI with GE-BOLD using NORDIC and phase regression

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, only a limited number of studies have reported on 3T layer-specific GE-BOLD fMRI (Koopmans, Barth, and Norris 2010;Scheeringa et al 2016;Irati Markuerkiaga et al 2021;Knudsen et al 2023). Among these, the study by Knudsen et al (2023) addressed the draining-vein contamination issue by employing phase regression techniques to mitigate bias toward superficial cortical layers. Phase regression operates by removing signals from vessels that generate a non-zero net phase, typically vessels that are large and oriented in a particular direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date, only a limited number of studies have reported on 3T layer-specific GE-BOLD fMRI (Koopmans, Barth, and Norris 2010;Scheeringa et al 2016;Irati Markuerkiaga et al 2021;Knudsen et al 2023). Among these, the study by Knudsen et al (2023) addressed the draining-vein contamination issue by employing phase regression techniques to mitigate bias toward superficial cortical layers. Phase regression operates by removing signals from vessels that generate a non-zero net phase, typically vessels that are large and oriented in a particular direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study implemented the phase regression method for comparative purposes. The phase regression approach was applied to remove the macrovascular component in the BOLD signal as indicated in previous reports (Menon 2002; Knudsen et al 2023). This macrovascular component not only contributes to alterations in signal magnitude, but also introduces phase variations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This intermixing of the blood draining from each layer potentially reduces the laminar BOLD signal spatial specificity and results in a larger BOLD signal change near the surface, in part because they collect draining blood from the entire depth, and in part because the pial veins comprise a significant fraction of a voxel at these resolutions. Previous studies have attempted to address the draining veins issue by post-processing methods such as masking out the signal from veins (Chen et al, 2013;Koopmans et al, 2010), deconvolution (Hollander et al, 2021;Markuerkiaga et al, 2021), phase regression (Knudsen et al, 2023;Menon, 2002;Stanley et al, 2021) or by employing fMRI contrasts with higher sensitivity to microvasculature such as SE (Goense and Logothetis, 2006;Yacoub et al, 2003;Zhao et al, 2006), GREASE (Beckett et al, 2020;Martino et al, 2013;Polimeni, 2018) and VASO (Huber et al, 2014b;Lu et al, 2003).…”
Section: Monocular and Binocular Vaso Laminar Responses Peak In Lower...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Whereas the microvas-culature gives the most spatially specific BOLD contributions, draining pial veins are the largest source of dHb and lead to the strongest and furthest reaching BOLD effect, reducing spatial specificity of the BOLD signal. 8,9,11 Therefore, microvascular specificity - high sensitivity to microvessels and low sensitivity to macrovessels (mainly pial veins) - is desired to infer activation patterns from the fMRI data. The supralinear increase of microvascular contributions with increasing field strength versus a linear increase of macrovascular contributions has been a significant drive to build high field ( ≥ 7T) MRI systems with a promise of increased microvascular specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%