2023
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4507872
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Semi-Supervised Non-Negative Matrix Factorization with Weighted Label Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semisupervised multilabel learning falls into two categories. One category is transductive multilabel learning, which assumes testing instances are from unlabeled instances [28,29]. In [28], the authors assumed that the similarity in the label space is closely related to that in the feature space, and thus employed the similarity in the feature space to guide learning on missing label assignments, leading to a constrained non-negative matrix factorization optimization.…”
Section: Weak Labelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Semisupervised multilabel learning falls into two categories. One category is transductive multilabel learning, which assumes testing instances are from unlabeled instances [28,29]. In [28], the authors assumed that the similarity in the label space is closely related to that in the feature space, and thus employed the similarity in the feature space to guide learning on missing label assignments, leading to a constrained non-negative matrix factorization optimization.…”
Section: Weak Labelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One category is transductive multilabel learning, which assumes testing instances are from unlabeled instances [28,29]. In [28], the authors assumed that the similarity in the label space is closely related to that in the feature space, and thus employed the similarity in the feature space to guide learning on missing label assignments, leading to a constrained non-negative matrix factorization optimization. In [29], the authors formulated a transductive multilabel learning method as an optimization problem in estimating label concept compositions.…”
Section: Weak Labelsmentioning
confidence: 99%