2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Segmentation of Multiple Cavities of the Heart in Wide-View 3-D Transesophageal Echocardiograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although higher errors were found in this experiment (Table II) when compared with experiment 1 (CT acquisition versus ideal model, Table I), it can be easily explained by the difficulties to visualize the boundary positions in US images, image artifacts caused by the water tank walls, the difficulties to the detect limits of the generated orifices and the low field of view of the TEE probe (which hamper the identification of the phantom's extreme positions). [32][33][34] In addition and as discussed in other studies, 32,35 manual segmentation of US images is more prone to errors and harder to be performed than in CT, justifying again the higher errors found in Table II. To increase the realism of the current ultrasound image, graphite particles or glycerin should be combined with the flexible material, as suggested in previous studies. 14 Such particles will generate speckle noise in the resulting ultrasound image, making the cardiac wall heterogeneous (i.e., multiple intensity values in the ultrasound image) and thus obtaining more realistic, non-saturated walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although higher errors were found in this experiment (Table II) when compared with experiment 1 (CT acquisition versus ideal model, Table I), it can be easily explained by the difficulties to visualize the boundary positions in US images, image artifacts caused by the water tank walls, the difficulties to the detect limits of the generated orifices and the low field of view of the TEE probe (which hamper the identification of the phantom's extreme positions). [32][33][34] In addition and as discussed in other studies, 32,35 manual segmentation of US images is more prone to errors and harder to be performed than in CT, justifying again the higher errors found in Table II. To increase the realism of the current ultrasound image, graphite particles or glycerin should be combined with the flexible material, as suggested in previous studies. 14 Such particles will generate speckle noise in the resulting ultrasound image, making the cardiac wall heterogeneous (i.e., multiple intensity values in the ultrasound image) and thus obtaining more realistic, non-saturated walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…) and also its superior accuracy throughout the phantom construction stage. Although higher errors were found in this experiment (Table ) when compared with experiment 1 (CT acquisition versus ideal model, Table ), it can be easily explained by the difficulties to visualize the boundary positions in US images, image artifacts caused by the water tank walls, the difficulties to the detect limits of the generated orifices and the low field of view of the TEE probe (which hamper the identification of the phantom's extreme positions) . In addition and as discussed in other studies, manual segmentation of US images is more prone to errors and harder to be performed than in CT, justifying again the higher errors found in Table .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Multi-view and multi-probe imaging have been introduced for cardiac applications, showing promising results in improving lateral resolution and contrast [19][20][21][22][23][24]. However, its major shortcoming is the use of separate US image acquisitions, obtained manually at different time points, which can result in misalignment of the images due to changes in hemodynamic variables such as heart rate or ventricular pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously we developed a method to generate a surface model of the heart from ultrasound images 13, 14 . We sought to adapt this methodology to non-ecg gated and non-contrast thoracic CT scans and then explore the utility of the resulting data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%