1992
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199207000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Salvage of Complicated Microvascular Transplants Monitored with Quantitative Fluorometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second was the false-positive rate, which was calculated as all flaps with positive monitoring alarms that were found to have no pedicle compromise (i.e., false positives) divided by all flaps with no pedicle compromise (i.e., all false positives and all true negatives). These have been described previously as true tests of the efficacy of each technique by Whitney et al 9 and Lineaweaver, 21 with flap salvage rate showing the benefit of any monitoring technique in improving outcomes and the false-positive rate reporting the number of needless returns to theater. Both of these measures are aimed at demonstrating the effectiveness of the monitoring technique when compared with no monitoring at all (or a nonfunctioning monitor, a concept that is also of Lineaweaver's invention 21 ).…”
Section: Algorithm and Outcome Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second was the false-positive rate, which was calculated as all flaps with positive monitoring alarms that were found to have no pedicle compromise (i.e., false positives) divided by all flaps with no pedicle compromise (i.e., all false positives and all true negatives). These have been described previously as true tests of the efficacy of each technique by Whitney et al 9 and Lineaweaver, 21 with flap salvage rate showing the benefit of any monitoring technique in improving outcomes and the false-positive rate reporting the number of needless returns to theater. Both of these measures are aimed at demonstrating the effectiveness of the monitoring technique when compared with no monitoring at all (or a nonfunctioning monitor, a concept that is also of Lineaweaver's invention 21 ).…”
Section: Algorithm and Outcome Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Currently, the only method that is ubiquitous amongst microsurgical units is the use of clinical monitoring. 7,8 Although some studies have demonstrated that adjunctive monitoring techniques may have benefit, and indeed that flap salvage rate may be increased, [9][10][11] there are still no large-scale comparative trials supporting these studies. Without reasonable evidence for new monitoring techniques, bedside monitoring has remained the norm, with some units using adjunctive techniques at the discretion of the surgeon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the distal target vessel could not be further debrided and if there were still concerns about vessel quality, heparin was added. Skin islands were monitored by physical exam, fluorometry, 8 and surface Doppler confirming perfusion from day 1 through day 5 postoperatively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Monitoring circulation of microsurgical flaps has been repeatedly examined for efficacy in early detection of vascular complications in the hope that prompt detection and treatment of such complications can avoid the tissue degeneration due to prolonged secondary ischemia and reperfusion cycles leading to flap death. [5][6][7] Thus far, no single method of flap circulation monitoring has been described as reliable and ideal. The most commonly used method of monitoring has been mere clinical examination, which employs observation of tissue color, capillary refill, and bleeding tests.…”
Section: Microsurgery 17:306-312 1996mentioning
confidence: 99%