2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47867-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Rounding Techniques for the MAX 2-SAT and MAX DI-CUT Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
110
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the problem of Max-2CSP(2) has an approximation algorithm with a guarantee of 0.874 [18], this implies an approximation algorithm for Max-EGI 2 with the same guarantee and since Max-2Lin-2 is hard to approximate beyond 0.878 under UGC [16], we have almost matching upper and lower bounds for Max-EGI 2 under UGC.…”
Section: Lemma 10mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As the problem of Max-2CSP(2) has an approximation algorithm with a guarantee of 0.874 [18], this implies an approximation algorithm for Max-EGI 2 with the same guarantee and since Max-2Lin-2 is hard to approximate beyond 0.878 under UGC [16], we have almost matching upper and lower bounds for Max-EGI 2 under UGC.…”
Section: Lemma 10mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…, n}. For k = 2, which is Max-DiCut, the semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation is shown to yield a ≈ 1.144-approximation in [14], improving upon previous analyses of [15], [21], and [5]. As mentioned above, RMAS is a generalization of Max-k-Ordering, and a 2 √ 2-approximation for it based on linear programming (LP) rounding was shown recently by Grandoni et al [7] which is also the best approximation for Max-k-Ordering for k = 3.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It gives a 1 4 approximation to Max 2-AND and a 1 2 approximation to Max CUT. There are algorithms that use semidefinite programming to achieve about 0.874 approximation to Max 2-AND [17] and about 0.878 approximation to Max CUT [11]. Assum-ing the Unique Games Conjecture, these algorithms are optimal for Max CUT [15,19], and nearly optimal for Max 2-AND (which under this assumption is hard to approximate within 0.87435 [5]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%