2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved response rate in patients with prognostically poor locally advanced rectal cancer after treatment with induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy when compared with chemoradiotherapy alone: A matched case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current findings are consistent with previous publications demonstrating relatively high rates of primary tumour response and compliance with chemotherapy for TNT in comparison with standard neoadjuvant treatment 25–27 . At the time of introduction of our protocol there was a paucity of level 1 evidence for TNT, given the four randomized controlled trials had not been published in full yet 11–13,28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current findings are consistent with previous publications demonstrating relatively high rates of primary tumour response and compliance with chemotherapy for TNT in comparison with standard neoadjuvant treatment 25–27 . At the time of introduction of our protocol there was a paucity of level 1 evidence for TNT, given the four randomized controlled trials had not been published in full yet 11–13,28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The current findings are consistent with previous publications demonstrating relatively high rates of primary tumour response and compliance with chemotherapy for TNT in comparison with standard neoadjuvant treatment. [25][26][27] At the time of introduction of our protocol there was a paucity of level 1 evidence for TNT, given the four randomized controlled trials had not been published in full yet. [11][12][13]28 To account for this, we employed an integrated approach across disciplines with justification based on level 2 data, ethics committee approval, and rigorous prospective data collection with frequent reporting of outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on improved survival has been demonstrated in numerous publications [ 33 35 ]. However, besides these advantages, short- and long-term disadvantages of neoadjuvant therapy should also be mentioned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 10% CR rate is assumed in patients diagnosed with hr-LARC, treated with chemoradiotherapy alone prior to surgery [ 30 , 32 ]. Based on the available literature and a retrospective analysis of patients from our own institution a CR rate of 20% is hypothesised after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for hr-LARC [ 30 , 32 , 33 ]. A 5% significance level and a 90% power, resulted in a total of 121 required patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to the current treatment regimen has been suggested [26][27][28][29]. A matched casecontrol study observed an improved complete response (CR) rate of 28% compared to 9% (p = 0.013) with the addition of doublet chemotherapy to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with unfavourable LARC, defined as any cT4 rectal cancer, or cT2/3 rectal cancer with extramural venous invasion (EMVI), and/or tumour deposits, and/or cN2 disease on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [30]. These results on CR are in line with those of three recently published, phase III randomised controlled trials in LARC [28,31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%