2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved pushover method for seismic analysis of shallow buried underground rectangular frame structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the joints undergo coordinated deformation, the internal force of the prefabricated component without joints is greater than or equal to that with joints, which is consistent with the conclusion obtained from the comparative analysis of the internal force of cast-in-place and fabricated station structures in relevant studies [31,49]. According to relevant literature, the change in seismic conditions [50][51][52] and peak acceleration [53][54][55] of a seismic wave will increase the seismic response of underground structures and, more importantly, will obviously change the seismic response characteristics. In order to further analyze the influence of the joint distribution on the seismic response of the fabricated station structure, the seismic conditions and peak acceleration were analyzed and the results are given in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 according to the research ideas of Section 4.1.…”
Section: Internal Forcesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Since the joints undergo coordinated deformation, the internal force of the prefabricated component without joints is greater than or equal to that with joints, which is consistent with the conclusion obtained from the comparative analysis of the internal force of cast-in-place and fabricated station structures in relevant studies [31,49]. According to relevant literature, the change in seismic conditions [50][51][52] and peak acceleration [53][54][55] of a seismic wave will increase the seismic response of underground structures and, more importantly, will obviously change the seismic response characteristics. In order to further analyze the influence of the joint distribution on the seismic response of the fabricated station structure, the seismic conditions and peak acceleration were analyzed and the results are given in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 according to the research ideas of Section 4.1.…”
Section: Internal Forcesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Jiang et al [84] proposed a similar conceptual approach to the one presented by He and Chen [82], for performing pushover analysis of underground structures to obtain the PSDM, accounting for both horizontal and vertical earthquake excitation effects. The researchers analyzed the seismic vulnerability of various types of subway stations (i.e., two-story, two span and two-story, three span, subway stations; Daikai subway station, in Kobe Japan, which collapsed during the 1996 Great Hanshin earthquake).…”
Section: Mountain Tunnels and Tunnels In Rockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies used 2D numerical models of the examined ground structure configurations to perform pushover analyses, to estimate the structural capacity of, and set the thresholds for, the damage states to develop fragility functions. In most cases the general-purposed FE code ABAQUS was employed to perform the analyses (i.e., more than half of the studies) [56,[63][64][65][66]82,84,85,[89][90][91][92][93][94]. Other FE codes, such as PLAXIS 2D [61], MIDAS [51,60], and SAP2000 [79,80] were also used.…”
Section: Numerical Codes and Constitutive Models Used In Analytical S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zou et al [6] proposed an improved finite element method, NewPSA, to predict the nonlinear behavior of underground frame structures under horizontal seismic action and a new one-dimensional seismic analysis method to calculate the distribution of displacement and shear stress along the depth in the free field with the increase of the movement of bedrock. Jiang et al [7] proposed an improved pushover analysis method (I-PAM) and proved that I-PAM could accurately predict the maximum axial force, bending moment, and displacement of the structure. Shi et al [8] and Yu and Yuan [9], respectively, adopted the response displacement method to discuss the applicability of the seismic analysis of underground integrated pipe corridor and complex underground large space structure, as well as the selection of foundation spring stiffness and the simulation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%