Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 1995
DOI: 10.2523/30598-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Pulsed Neutron Capture Logging With Slim Carbon-Oxygen Tools: Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the TDT-P signal model, the RST model utilizes a dynamic parameterization technique 6 . The RST tool response was recorded in a combination of over 1300 laboratory and 400 modeled formations and mapped to the formation sigma, formation porosity, salinity of the borehole fluid, and other formation property curves.…”
Section: Rst Processing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the TDT-P signal model, the RST model utilizes a dynamic parameterization technique 6 . The RST tool response was recorded in a combination of over 1300 laboratory and 400 modeled formations and mapped to the formation sigma, formation porosity, salinity of the borehole fluid, and other formation property curves.…”
Section: Rst Processing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the RST tool uses the dual-burst measurement technique, in the sigma mode, with 126 measurement gates (Fig. 2), more efficient detectors, and a more powerful neutron source that generates over twice the neutron yield in neutrons/second of the existing TDT-P tool 6 . The depth of investigation for optimum sigma logging conditions is about 10 inches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulsed neutron measurements are made using pulsed neutron bursts created by a minitron which, after losing energy by interactions with the formation and the fluids, will reach thermal energy level and can then be captured. The capture cross section, SIGMA (Σ), is measured, from which the quantitative amount of water and gas saturations can be determined (Plasek and al, 2005). For a quantitative interpretation effective porosity and lithology is needed.…”
Section: Reservoir Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model the tool response with Monte Carlo techniques under the conditions measured in the laboratory to benchmark the model. 3. Develop interpretation procedures that quantitatively predict tool response using air to simulate gas.…”
Section: Threećphase Holdup Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%