2012
DOI: 10.1080/15257770.2012.724491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Protocol for the Synthesis of Flexibly Protected Morpholino Monomers from Unprotected Ribonucleosides

Abstract: An inexpensive and much improved protocol has been developed for the synthesis of protected morpholino monomers from unprotected ribonucleosides in high overall yield, using oxidative glycol cleavage and reductive amination strategy. Unlike the previous methods, the present strategy allows installing the exocyclic amine protections at a later stage, and thus avoids the use of expensive, or commercially unavailable, exocyclic amine-protected ribonucleosides as starting materials. To demonstrate the flexibility … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, deprotonations were carried out with sodium hydride and subsequent quenching was done with N,N ‐dimethylphosphoramic dichloride, 5 a to obtain chlorophosphoramidate activated monomer 6 as a 1:1 diastereomeric mixture due to the formation of a new chiral phosphorus centre, as confirmed by 31 P NMR. To achieve transporter G3 ( 1 ), the 7′‐azido morpholino monomer unit 7 was used as the starting monomer, obtained from N 4 ‐benzoyl‐7′‐hydroxy‐ N ‐trityl morpholinocytidine in 84 % yield over three steps (See Supporting Information Scheme S1). Free morpholine amine of 7 was then coupled with activated monomer 6 to get dimer 8 as 1:1 diastereomeric mixture of almost same polarity in 73 % total yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, deprotonations were carried out with sodium hydride and subsequent quenching was done with N,N ‐dimethylphosphoramic dichloride, 5 a to obtain chlorophosphoramidate activated monomer 6 as a 1:1 diastereomeric mixture due to the formation of a new chiral phosphorus centre, as confirmed by 31 P NMR. To achieve transporter G3 ( 1 ), the 7′‐azido morpholino monomer unit 7 was used as the starting monomer, obtained from N 4 ‐benzoyl‐7′‐hydroxy‐ N ‐trityl morpholinocytidine in 84 % yield over three steps (See Supporting Information Scheme S1). Free morpholine amine of 7 was then coupled with activated monomer 6 to get dimer 8 as 1:1 diastereomeric mixture of almost same polarity in 73 % total yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction with sodium cyanoborohydride in the presence of glacial acetic acid provided crude morpholine 78 . 44,45 N -Tritylation furnished 79 in 43% yield over four synthetic steps. 44,46 Desilylation followed by sulfamoylation of 80 in DME–MeCN afforded sulfamate 81 that was biotinylated using our standard protocol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,45 N -Tritylation furnished 79 in 43% yield over four synthetic steps. 44,46 Desilylation followed by sulfamoylation of 80 in DME–MeCN afforded sulfamate 81 that was biotinylated using our standard protocol. The synthesis was completed by ammonolysis to remove the N 6 -benzoyl group and by subsequent treatment with 80% aqueous acetic acid to deprotect the N -trityl group to give 82 in 36% yield over three steps from 81 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morpholinos are prepared on a solid‐support using an iterative two‐step process that consists of detritylation and successive coupling of the chlorophosphoramidate‐activated monomers (Summerton and Weller, ). In this unit, the synthesis of the 7′‐hydroxyl morpholino monomers, starting from unprotected ribonucleosides of adenosine, guanosine, 5‐methyluridine, and cytidine (see and Alternate Protocols 1 to 3) using a periodate cleavage/Schiff base formation/reduction cycle is described (Pattanayak et al, ). These hydroxyl monomers are then converted to chlorophosphoramidate‐activated monomers using a combination of lithium bromide and DBU (Pattanayak and Sinha, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%