Improved protocol for plasma microRNA extraction and comparison of commercial kits

Abstract

Introduction MicroRNAs are small, non-coding RNA molecules that are becoming popular biomarkers in several diseases. However, their low abundance in serum/plasma poses a challenge in exploiting their potential in clinics. Several commercial kits are available for rapid isolation of microRNA from plasma. However, reports guiding the selection of appropriate kits to study downstream assays are scarce. Hence, we compared four commercial kits to evaluate microRNA-extraction from plasma and provided a modified protocol that further improved the superior kit’s performance. Materials and methods We compared four kits (miRNeasy Serum/Plasma, miRNeasy Mini Kit from Qiagen; RNA-isolation, and Absolutely-RNA MicroRNA Kit from Agilent technologies) for quality and quantity of microRNA isolated, extraction efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Bioanalyzer-based Agilent Small RNA kit was used to evaluate quality and quantity of microRNA. Extraction efficiency was evaluated by detection of four endogenous control microRNA using real-time-PCR. Further, we modified the manufacturer’s protocol for miRNeasy Serum/Plasma kit to improve yield. Results miRNeasy Serum/Plasma kit outperformed the other three kits in microRNA-quality (P < 0.005) and yielded maximum microRNA-quantity. Recovery of endogenous control microRNA i.e. hsa-miR-24-3p, hsa-miR-191-5p, hsa-miR-423-5p and hsa-miR-484 was higher as well. Modification with the inclusion of a double elution step enhanced yield of microRNA extracted with miRNeasy Serum/Plasma kit significantly (P < 0.001). Conclusion We demonstrated that miRNeasy Serum/Plasma kit outperforms other kits and can be reliably used with a limited plasma quantity. We have provided a modified microRNA-extraction protocol with improved microRNA output for downstream analyses.

A novel method to purify small RNAs from human tissues for methylation analysis by LC-MS/MS

“…As the previous reports (Guo et al, 2017;Sriram et al, 2021), the small RNA extraction kits did not perform as well as Trizol in the separation of miRNA. The total RNAs of the normal lung tissue and sperm samples were extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instruction.…”

Clinical Value and Molecular Function of Circulating MicroRNAs in Endometrial Cancer Regulation: A Systematic Review

“…In this systematic review of literature, no studies analyzed the variation of miR expression according to body mass index (BMI). BMI can influence miR expression as shown in the study of Hijmans et al [ 59 ]. In this study, miR-34a expression was significantly higher in obese patients compared to normal-weight and overweight patients, whereas miR-126, miR-146a, and miR-150 expression were significantly lower in obese and overweight patients compared to normal-weight patients.…”

Improving the Performance of Selective Solid-State Nanopore Sensing Using a Polyhistidine-Tagged Monovalent Streptavidin

“…Purification was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions but with the final elution step conducted twice to maximize recovery. 36 RNA isolate from an unspiked plasma aliquot was also acquired using the same procedure and used as a negative control. After isolation, a biotinylated DNA complement probe (100 nM) was added to all isolates and heated to 95 °C for 10 min and then cooled to 39 °C over 2 h to promote annealing to miRNA oligos.…”

“…Synthetic cel-miR-54 miRNA (described above) was spiked into the plasma at concentrations of 1, 10, or 100 nM after the addition of the protein precipitate buffer (kit buffer “RPP”) to ensure the stability of the bare synthetic RNA. Purification was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions but with the final elution step conducted twice to maximize recovery . RNA isolate from an unspiked plasma aliquot was also acquired using the same procedure and used as a negative control.…”