2020
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved protein model quality assessment by integrating sequential and pairwise features using deep learning

Abstract: Motivation Accurately estimating protein model quality in the absence of experimental structure is not only important for model evaluation and selection but also useful for model refinement. Progress has been steadily made by introducing new features and algorithms (especially deep neural networks), but the accuracy of quality assessment (QA) is still not very satisfactory, especially local QA on hard protein targets. Results … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xu’s group developed ResNetQA [ 69 ] (a ResNet-based QA method for both local and global quality assessment of a protein model. ResNetQA is a single-model method.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Advances In Various Steps Of Protein Structure Prediction Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xu’s group developed ResNetQA [ 69 ] (a ResNet-based QA method for both local and global quality assessment of a protein model. ResNetQA is a single-model method.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Advances In Various Steps Of Protein Structure Prediction Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…QDeep [ 68 ] uses ResNet for estimating the quality of a protein structural model. Similarly, ResNetQA [ 69 ] is a local and global quality assessment method composed of both 1D and 2D convolutional residual neural networks (ResNet). DeepAccNet [ 72 ] estimates per-residue accuracy and residue–residue distance signed error in protein models and uses these predictions to guide Rosetta protein structure refinement using a convolutional neural network.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Advances In Various Steps Of Protein Structure Prediction Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been multiple approaches developed over last 30 years. These include physics-based techniques [Randall andBaldi, 2008, Faraggi andKloczkowski, 2014], statistical and unsupervised methods, such as DFIRE [Zhou and Zhou, 2002], DOPE [Shen and Sali, 2006], GOAP [Zhou and Skolnick, 2011], RWplus [Zhang and Zhang, 2010], ORDER_AVE [Liu et al, 2014], VoroMQA [Olechnovič and Venclovas, 2014] and more, classical ML-approaches ModelEvaluator [Wang et al, 2009], ProQ2 [Ray et al, 2012], Wang_SVM [Liu et al, 2016], Qprob [Cao and Cheng, 2016], SBROD [Karasikov et al, 2019], a learning-to-rank technique [Jing et al, 2016], deep learning methods [Derevyanko et al, 2018, Conover et al, 2019, Sato and Ishida, 2019, Jing and Xu, 2020, Hiranuma et al, 2020, neural [Wallner and Elofsson, 2003], and graph neural networks [Baldassarre et al, 2020, Sanyal et al, 2020, Igashov et al, 2020.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference from existing methods that use predicted distances between residues to predict model quality scores (Jing and Xu, 2020) is that ROPIUS0 uses distances predicted by the deep learning module directly for model accuracy estimation and selection. We show that the direct use of predicted distances may be sufficient to achieve satisfactory results even in the presence of some limitations, which we discuss in Section 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%