2001
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Prognostication of Renal Cell Carcinoma Using an Integrated Staging System

Abstract: A novel system for staging and predicting survival for RCC integrating clinical variables is offered. UISS is simple to use and is superior to stage alone in differentiating patients' survival. Our data suggests that UISS is an important prognostic tool for counseling patients with various stages of kidney cancer. Further prospective large-scale validation with external data is awaited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
347
0
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 650 publications
(362 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
347
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Distribution of prognostic factors according to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) (Motzer et al, 1999) and UCLA Integrated Staging System (Zisman et al, 2001) are given in Table 2a and b.…”
Section: Patients and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distribution of prognostic factors according to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) (Motzer et al, 1999) and UCLA Integrated Staging System (Zisman et al, 2001) are given in Table 2a and b.…”
Section: Patients and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-operative predictive models including the MSKCC post-operative prognostic nomogram, the Mayo clinic SSIGN score and UCLA UISS score were created using clinical stage, tumor histology, pathologic tumor size, pathologic stage and grade, pathologic necrosis, ECOG performance score and symptomatic presentation to predict the freedom from disease recurrence or overall survival after definitive therapy. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Since the various post-operative predictive tools are based on pathologic variables, their utility in the pre-operative setting is limited. A pre-operative tool that predicts the likelihood of metastatic disease following definitive surgical therapy would be useful to risk-stratify patients prior to surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We relied on two modified FG schemes. The modified two-tiered FG scheme was described by Zisman et al 14 and consisted of grouping FG 1 and 2, as well of grouping FG 3 and 4. The modified three-tiered FG system was described by Ficarra et al 13 It consisted of grouping FG 1 and 2 and keeping FG 3 and 4 unchanged.…”
Section: Description Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we tested and quantified the added value of FG relative to other established prognostic factors. Additionally, we also compared the gains in discriminant accuracy related to the use of the conventional four-tiered FG scheme relative to a modified three- 13 and two-tiered 14 FG schemes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%