2008
DOI: 10.5194/npg-15-435-2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved preservation of autocorrelative structure in surrogate data using an initial wavelet step

Abstract: Abstract. Surrogate data generation algorithms are useful for hypothesis testing or for generating realisations of a process for data extension or modelling purposes. This paper tests a well known surrogate data generation method against a stochastic and also a hybrid wavelet-Fourier transform variant of the original algorithm. The data used for testing vary in their persistence and intermittency, and include synthetic and actual data. The hybrid wavelet-Fourier algorithm outperforms the others in its ability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, phase synchronisation measures are generally compared to the mean phase synchronisation for several random sorts of the phase data [22], while intermittency and structures in turbulent flows have been evaluated using surrogates that preserve both the histogram of the original data and its spectral properties [3,31]. The computation of such surrogates can be undertaken using Fourier [32] or waveletbased methods [15,16,19]. Given the simple nature of the null hypothesis in this study, the Fourier method (known as the Iterated Amplitude Adjusted Fourier Transform, or IAAFT method) was adopted.…”
Section: Confidence Limits On the Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, phase synchronisation measures are generally compared to the mean phase synchronisation for several random sorts of the phase data [22], while intermittency and structures in turbulent flows have been evaluated using surrogates that preserve both the histogram of the original data and its spectral properties [3,31]. The computation of such surrogates can be undertaken using Fourier [32] or waveletbased methods [15,16,19]. Given the simple nature of the null hypothesis in this study, the Fourier method (known as the Iterated Amplitude Adjusted Fourier Transform, or IAAFT method) was adopted.…”
Section: Confidence Limits On the Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified iterated amplitude adjusted Fourier transform (IAAFT) was used to generate a linear surrogate trueC()s from a spatial series of curvatures C ( s ) in four steps [see Keylock , , ]. Our procedure for computing curvature series from centerlines is laid out in Appendix A.…”
Section: Is Form Nonlinearity Present In Natural Rivers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WiAAFT-procedure follows the iAAFT-algorithm but uses the Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform (MODWT) where the iAAFT-procedure is applied to each set of wavelet detail coefficients D j (n) over the dyadic scales 2 j−1 for j = 1, · · · , J, i.e., each set of D j (n) is considered as a time series of its own. The main difference between iAAFT and wiAAFT algorithms is that the former is designed to produce constrained, linear realisations of a process that can be compared with the original time series on some measure, while the later algorithm restricts the possible class of realisations to those that retain some aspect of the local mean and variance of the original time series (Keylock, 2008).…”
Section: Surrogate Data Methods and Statistical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%