2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Prediction of Signal Peptides: SignalP 3.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

15
1,702
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,767 publications
(1,721 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
15
1,702
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, classical excretorysecretory (ES) proteins of S. haematobium were predicted (on the basis of the presence of a signal peptide at the N terminus) using SignalP v.3.0 (ref. 40; using both the neural network and hidden Markov models) and the absence of a transmembrane domain using TMHMM 41 , and by BLASTp 42 homology-searching of the validated signal peptide database (SPD) 43 and an ES database containing published proteomic data for nematodes (Brugia malayi and Meloidogyne incognita) and trematodes (S. mansoni, S. japonicum, O. viverrini and F. hepatica) 13,14,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50] . The secondary structure of genes specific to S. haematobium were predicted using PSIPRED 51 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, classical excretorysecretory (ES) proteins of S. haematobium were predicted (on the basis of the presence of a signal peptide at the N terminus) using SignalP v.3.0 (ref. 40; using both the neural network and hidden Markov models) and the absence of a transmembrane domain using TMHMM 41 , and by BLASTp 42 homology-searching of the validated signal peptide database (SPD) 43 and an ES database containing published proteomic data for nematodes (Brugia malayi and Meloidogyne incognita) and trematodes (S. mansoni, S. japonicum, O. viverrini and F. hepatica) 13,14,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50] . The secondary structure of genes specific to S. haematobium were predicted using PSIPRED 51 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial sequences were excluded and the remaining genes were regarded as CRN proteins. Secretion signals of serine peptidases and CRN proteins were identified using three tools (SignalP [34], TargetP [35], and iPSORT [36]) with default settings. The conserved N-terminal profiles were generated using WebLogo http://weblogo.berkeley.edu.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tree reconstruction, we first applied PROTTEST (Abascal et al 2005) to estimate the optimal model of amino acid substitution (consistently found to be WAGCICG), then calculated a maximum likelihood tree using PHYML (Guindon & Gascuel 2003) with this model (the proportion of invariant sites calculated from the alignment, and four rate categories with a gamma distribution parameter estimated from the data). Signal sequences were predicted using SIGNALP v. 3.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/ services/SignalP-3.0/; Bendtsen et al 2004) and SIGCLEAVE (http://bioweb.pasteur.fr/seqanal/interfaces/sigcleave.html). Homopolymeric runs were accessed at the TRIPS database (http://www.ncl-india.org/trips/index.html; Katti et al 2000), compiled from SWISSPROT Release 38, followed by checking updated sequences in SWISSPROT Release 44.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%