2020
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved prediction of mortality by combinations of inflammatory markers and standard clinical scores in patients with acute‐on‐chronic liver failure and acute decompensation

Abstract: Background and AimAcute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a sinister prognosis, and there is a need for accurate biomarkers and scoring systems to better characterize ACLF patients and predict prognosis. Systemic inflammation and renal failure are hallmarks in ACLF disease development and progression. We hypothesized that the combination of specific inflammatory markers in combination with clinical scores are better predictors of survival than the originally developed CLIF‐C acute decompensation (AD) and CLIF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 This allows one to hypothesise that this cell type, along with macrophages, may be important in ACLF. 45,46 The present study has some important strengths and limitations. This study comprises a very well-defined study cohort of patients with AD and ACLF, derived from the prospectively performed multicentre observational CANONIC trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 This allows one to hypothesise that this cell type, along with macrophages, may be important in ACLF. 45,46 The present study has some important strengths and limitations. This study comprises a very well-defined study cohort of patients with AD and ACLF, derived from the prospectively performed multicentre observational CANONIC trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 24 This allows one to hypothesise that this cell type, along with macrophages, may be important in ACLF. 45 , 46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, sMR is not as specific a marker of macrophage activation as sCD163. However, elevated sMR levels have previously been described in patients with liver disease and are shown to be associated to disease severity, portal hypertension and mortality (Gronbaek et al, 2016b;Laursen et al, 2017;Sandahl et al, 2017;Grønbaek et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, patients suffering from acute liver injury due to acetaminophen overdose, acute cirrhosis decompensation, ACLF, and alcoholic hepatitis have markedly increased plasma levels of sMR with 2.5-to 5fold higher median values compared with healthy individuals (64,68,69). In addition, combining the CLIF-C ACLF score and sCD163 improves the prediction of 90 days mortality, while sMR in addition to the CLIF-C acute decompensation (AD) score improves the prediction of 90 and 180 days mortality (64,70).…”
Section: Macrophage Activation Markers In Liver Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%