2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-022-00476-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved prediction and characterization of blood-brain barrier penetrating peptides using estimated propensity scores of dipeptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy to compare the performance of the BrainPepPass with previously developed techniques for predicting B3PPs. While some ML-based tools, such as BBPpred, 67 B3Pred, 68 BBPpredict, 36 and SCMB3PP, 69 have been developed to predict the BBB permeability of peptides using ML algorithms trained with properties extracted from the primary structure of natural peptides encoded in FASTA format, the proposed ML-based framework presented herein employs a distinct approach by incorporating the 3D structure of these molecules encoded in MOL format. Additionally, most peptides used for training and testing BrainPepPass contain chemical modifications, which further distinguish our tool from those that focus on natural peptides.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy to compare the performance of the BrainPepPass with previously developed techniques for predicting B3PPs. While some ML-based tools, such as BBPpred, 67 B3Pred, 68 BBPpredict, 36 and SCMB3PP, 69 have been developed to predict the BBB permeability of peptides using ML algorithms trained with properties extracted from the primary structure of natural peptides encoded in FASTA format, the proposed ML-based framework presented herein employs a distinct approach by incorporating the 3D structure of these molecules encoded in MOL format. Additionally, most peptides used for training and testing BrainPepPass contain chemical modifications, which further distinguish our tool from those that focus on natural peptides.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%