2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2011.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved phylogenetic resolution of toxic and non-toxic Alexandrium strains using a concatenated rDNA approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(167 reference statements)
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that a strain of A. affine can produce low levels of STX (Nguyen Ngoc, 2004), while other studies have found that strains do not produce STXs (Hallegraeff et al, 1991;Band-Schmidt et al, 2003;Stüken et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2006). A strain of Alexandrium andersoni (CCMP2222) was reported to produce low levels of STXs (Ciminiello et al, 2000;Frangopulos et al, 2004), while other studies based on CCMP2222 and other strains of A. andersoni have not detected STXs (Sampedro et al, 2013;Stüken et al, 2011;Orr et al, 2011;Touzet et al, 2008). It is possible that sxtA related genes are no longer expressed in CCMP2222, or that early reports of STX production were in error.…”
Section: Presence Of Sxta Domains A1 and A4 And Sxtgmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported that a strain of A. affine can produce low levels of STX (Nguyen Ngoc, 2004), while other studies have found that strains do not produce STXs (Hallegraeff et al, 1991;Band-Schmidt et al, 2003;Stüken et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2006). A strain of Alexandrium andersoni (CCMP2222) was reported to produce low levels of STXs (Ciminiello et al, 2000;Frangopulos et al, 2004), while other studies based on CCMP2222 and other strains of A. andersoni have not detected STXs (Sampedro et al, 2013;Stüken et al, 2011;Orr et al, 2011;Touzet et al, 2008). It is possible that sxtA related genes are no longer expressed in CCMP2222, or that early reports of STX production were in error.…”
Section: Presence Of Sxta Domains A1 and A4 And Sxtgmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to determine the evolution of sxt within dinoflagellates, a resolved phylogeny of the group, including the genus Alexandrium and closely related Pyrodinium bahamense is necessary. Alexandrium has often appeared to form a monophyletic clade in phylogenetic analyses based on regions of the ribosomal DNA array, with a selected outgroup (John et al, 2003;Leaw et al, 2005;Orr et al, 2011;Anderson et al, 2012). Questions remain about the evolution of Alexandrium, as different studies have shown that the most basal clade is either: A. taylori (John et al, 2003;Rogers et al, 2006), A. leei (Leaw et al, 2005), a clade composed of the species A. satoanum, A. monilatum, A. taylori, A. hiranoi, A. pseudogonyaulax , and a clade including most of those species and A. leei (Anderson et al, 2012), or a clade including A. minutum, A. tamutum and A. ostenfeldii .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a phylogenetic point of view, it appears that STX production is paraphyletic within the genus Alexandrium and that STXproducing (STX ϩ ) and -nonproducing (STX Ϫ ) strains of the same species coexist (5). The presence of sxtA correlates well with the pattern of STX production, although there may be some apparent exceptions (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent research describing a greater number of globally distributed sequences has confirmed the clustering, renamed the ribotypes numerically as Groups I-V, and initially shown that these ribotypes exclusively include either toxic or non-toxic member species (Emily L. Lilly et al, 2007). These ribotypes differ from each other by 13-18% in their ITS1/5.8S/ITS2 sequences (Orr, Stüken, Rundberget, Eikrem, & Jakobsen, 2011) and offspring from the mating of two of the ribotypes are inviable (Brosnahan et al, 2010). These ribotypes were then characterized as separate species and given the names A. fundyense (Group I), A. mediterraneum (Group II), A. tamarense (Group III), A. pacificum (Group IV), and A. australiense (Group V) (John et al, 2014).…”
Section: A Tamarense Species Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%