2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1810.06441
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Photometric Classification of Supernovae using Deep Learning

Adam Moss

Abstract: We present improved photometric supernovae classification using deep recurrent neural networks. The main improvements over previous work are (i) the introduction of a time gate in the recurrent cell that uses the observational time as an input; (ii) greatly increased data augmentation including time translation, addition of Gaussian noise and early truncation of the lightcurve. For post Supernovae Photometric Classification Challenge (SPCC) data, using a training fraction of 5.2% (1103 supernovae) of a represe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extracted features can be used to classify supernovae using sequential cuts (Bazin et al 2011;Campbell et al 2013) or machine learning algorithms (Kessler et al 2010b;Möller et al 2016;Lochner et al 2016;Dai et al 2018). Recent advances in Deep Learning, a branch of machine learning, have shown that neural network classifiers trained on raw data can outperform classifiers based on handcrafted features (Charnock & Moss 2017;Kimura et al 2017;Moss 2018). In this work, we explore this promising direction and obtain state-of-the-art results on a variety of supernovae classification tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Extracted features can be used to classify supernovae using sequential cuts (Bazin et al 2011;Campbell et al 2013) or machine learning algorithms (Kessler et al 2010b;Möller et al 2016;Lochner et al 2016;Dai et al 2018). Recent advances in Deep Learning, a branch of machine learning, have shown that neural network classifiers trained on raw data can outperform classifiers based on handcrafted features (Charnock & Moss 2017;Kimura et al 2017;Moss 2018). In this work, we explore this promising direction and obtain state-of-the-art results on a variety of supernovae classification tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Deep learning is a branch of machine learning that seeks to eliminate the necessity of human-designed features, decreasing the computational cost as well as avoiding the introduction of potential biases (Charnock & Moss 2017;Moss 2018;Naul et al 2018;Aguirre et al 2019). In recent years, many deep learning techniques have been applied to the challenge of photometric SN classification.…”
Section: Photometric Supernova Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most approaches involve lightcurve template matching (Sako et al 2011), or feature extraction paired with either sequential cuts (Bazin et al 2011;Campbell et al 2013) or machine learning algorithms (Möller et al 2016;Lochner et al 2016;Dai et al 2018;Boone 2019). Most recently, the spotlight has been on deep learning techniques since it has been shown that classification based on handcrafted features is not only more time-intensive for the researcher but is outperformed by neural networks trained on raw data (Charnock & Moss 2017;Moss 2018;Kimura et al 2017). Since then, many neural network architectures have been explored for SN photometric classification, such as PELICAN's CNN architecture (Pasquet et al 2019) and SuperNNova's deep recurrent network (Möller & de Boissière 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%