2019 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/apec.2019.8722221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Partial Cancellation Method for High Frequency Core Loss Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, since the proposed method using the same core type and the number of windings of the IUT for the RT, it is relatively easy to fulfil a zero phase angle, and easy to match an inductance of 10 ∼ 1000 μH that is typical in power converters with a switching frequency of less than a few hundreds of kilohertz [37]. On the other hand, the other inductive reactive voltage cancellation methods for core loss measurement cannot match the IUT magnetizing inductance value as accurate as the proposed method, because they utilize air-cored inductors with a large number of windings to reach the matching inductance, which can lead to significant parasitic components and subsequently significant error of measurement [22], [26]- [27], [34]- [36].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis a Impact Of Rt Mismatchmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On one hand, since the proposed method using the same core type and the number of windings of the IUT for the RT, it is relatively easy to fulfil a zero phase angle, and easy to match an inductance of 10 ∼ 1000 μH that is typical in power converters with a switching frequency of less than a few hundreds of kilohertz [37]. On the other hand, the other inductive reactive voltage cancellation methods for core loss measurement cannot match the IUT magnetizing inductance value as accurate as the proposed method, because they utilize air-cored inductors with a large number of windings to reach the matching inductance, which can lead to significant parasitic components and subsequently significant error of measurement [22], [26]- [27], [34]- [36].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis a Impact Of Rt Mismatchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, this feature enables the proposed approach to accurately test the cases with the high value of the magnetizing inductances, which is not feasible for other inductive voltage cancellation methods such as Mu's and Hou's methods for core loss measurement; because the achievable inductance of the air-core transformer is limited by the parasitic elements, which could adversely affect the waveforms and the accuracy of the system especially at higher frequencies [22], [26]- [27], [34]- [36].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis a Impact Of Rt Mismatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As introduced, Hou's method is insensitive to the phase discrepancy and hence its results are considered as the most accurate baseline to verify the proposed approach. Although, Hou's method also has inherent errors such as the errors caused by the parasitic capacitance of the air-core transformer interwinding capacitance, and a voltage probe input capacitance, as discussed in [10][11][12]. It should be highlighted that the tested iron powder inductor has low permeability, while the proposed method still achieved small differences with respect to Hou's method.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Table II illustrates the experimental comparison of offline compensated results against uncompensated results for three inductors tested with ± 50V square wave and various frequencies, which are calculated by (11) The results show that for inductor 1 with an iron powder core, the difference is more significant than the other two inductors with ferrite cores. The reason is that the microscopic air gaps distributed in the iron powder core material reduce its core permeability and increase the measurement sensitivity to the skew of probes according to equation (2) and (5).…”
Section: Recalculate Core Loss With the Phase Discrepancy Compensatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation