2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01438-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved outcome of preterm infants when delivered in tertiary care centers

Abstract: Outborn infants were less mature and more ill than inborn infants at NICU admission. However, even after adjustment for perinatal risks and admission illness severity, inborn infants had better outcomes than outborn infants. Our results support in-utero transfer of high-risk pregnancies to a tertiary level facility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

6
54
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
54
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to other studies [31], inborn status did not show a protective effect in the first modelling process (n = 4,566). Again, correlation with hospital volume might be a possible explanation: In small obstetrical units 53% of infants were inborn, in large units it was only 46%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to other studies [31], inborn status did not show a protective effect in the first modelling process (n = 4,566). Again, correlation with hospital volume might be a possible explanation: In small obstetrical units 53% of infants were inborn, in large units it was only 46%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Only a minority of the infants were VLBW, the result of practicing an aggressive policy of in-utero transfer of high-risk patients. Such a policy, rather than ex-utero transfer, has been shown to be associated with a lower neonatal mortality and morbidity [1,6]. The greatest change in the MCRIB score was from the time of first call to the time of first look by the retrieval team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Birth outside a tertiary perinatal center increases the risk even further. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Potential reasons include incomplete antenatal corticosteroid coverage, attendance at delivery of staff members relatively inexperienced in neonatal resuscitation, delay in surfactant administration for respiratory distress syndrome, and unintentional hypothermia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%