2015
DOI: 10.4149/neo_2015_098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved outcome for children and adolescent with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the first decade of the 21st century: A report from the Slovak Republic

Abstract: Our aim was to analyze event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) among children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with International BFM Intercontinental trial (ALL IC 2002) therapy in the Slovak Republic. In total, 280 children and adolescent age 1 to 18 years were treated with ALL IC BFM 2002 based therapy from 2002 to 2012, which was divided into two periods. During 2002During -2007, when patients were actively enrolled in the ALL IC-BFM 2002 trial, and during 2008-2012 when… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1960s, less than 10% of children with ALL achieved a long-term survival. With current therapy, the chance for 5-year event-free survival and overall survival increased to almost 85% and 90%, respectively [2]. The dramatic improvement in the patient outcome was facilitated by stratification of treatment intensity based on the assessment of risk factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the 1960s, less than 10% of children with ALL achieved a long-term survival. With current therapy, the chance for 5-year event-free survival and overall survival increased to almost 85% and 90%, respectively [2]. The dramatic improvement in the patient outcome was facilitated by stratification of treatment intensity based on the assessment of risk factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dramatic improvement in the patient outcome was facilitated by stratification of treatment intensity based on the assessment of risk factors. These factors include clinical factors, patient response to induction therapy and cytogenetic abnormalities [1][2][3]. Patients with the greatest relapse risk receive the most aggressive treatment, and less intense regimens are given to patients at lower relapse risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation