2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100)
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2000.859184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved normalization without recourse to an impostor database for speaker verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these observations and inspired by the work described in [11], we explored the effect of slightly perturbing the mean of the target-dependent Gaussian using the target-independent Gaussian.…”
Section: Lrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these observations and inspired by the work described in [11], we explored the effect of slightly perturbing the mean of the target-dependent Gaussian using the target-independent Gaussian.…”
Section: Lrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this model might not be optimal. To improve the competitiveness of this model, a previous study [11] proposed the use of a modified normalizing model (MNM) determined by perturbing the inferred background model using the enrollment data to reflect the lexical content of the speaker's password. In another study [12], the authors proposed the use of the speaker enrollment data to (1) train a background model with fewer number of parameters compared to the speaker model or (2) perturbing the temporal information by reversing the state order of the previously trained background model.…”
Section: Speaker Verification 71 Score Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In single reference modeling approach, the two log likelihood ratios LLR s in (10) and LLR u in (11) are estimated as follows:…”
Section: Single Reference Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%