2015
DOI: 10.1016/s0894-9166(15)30005-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved normalization method for ductile fracture toughness determination based on dimensionless load separation principle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For fracture toughness value estimation, the blunting line was constructed by J = Mσ Y ∆a, in which the expression of a value of 2 or 4 for M was used to determine J Q value [10,17]. Meanwhile, it was reported that the slope of the blunting line (Mσ Y ) for determination of J Q may not affect when the ratio of yield strength (σ YS ) to tensile strength (σ UTS ) is close to 1 [18]. As summarized in Table 2, the calculation result of σ YS /σ UTS at 700 • C is 0.95, which is almost 1.…”
Section: Fracture Toughness Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fracture toughness value estimation, the blunting line was constructed by J = Mσ Y ∆a, in which the expression of a value of 2 or 4 for M was used to determine J Q value [10,17]. Meanwhile, it was reported that the slope of the blunting line (Mσ Y ) for determination of J Q may not affect when the ratio of yield strength (σ YS ) to tensile strength (σ UTS ) is close to 1 [18]. As summarized in Table 2, the calculation result of σ YS /σ UTS at 700 • C is 0.95, which is almost 1.…”
Section: Fracture Toughness Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between S i j and b i / W for different reference uncracked ligament length b i / W of SEB specimen for Q345B is shown in Figure . By referring to the work of Bao et al, the exponent m of geometry function in Equation can be easily determined by fitting the curve of S i j versus b i / W with a power function. This property can also be observed in the CT specimen, and the details are not repeated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landes and Begley 39 proposed that σ YS is used to calculate the length of stretch zone and 2σ Y was chosen as the slope of blunting line. In ASTM E1820 and many other literatures, 14,[26][27][28][29][30] σ Y is used for determining the blunted crack advance Δa bi . As stated in Landes and Begley, 39 the purpose of the blunting line is to determine fracture toughness, J Ic , not the blunting corrected crack length a bi .…”
Section: The Modified Nmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance in terms of accuracy of the NM for a range of steels has been investigated by various researchers with different specimen materials. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] They used UC as the benchmark to evaluate the performance of NM because UC is popular and usually assumed to be reliable. Their test results show that a large difference exists in fracture toughness as determined by UC and NM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation