2010
DOI: 10.1364/ao.49.006472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Newton–Raphson digital image correlation method for full-field displacement and strain calculation

Abstract: The 2-D inplane displacement and strain calculation problem through digital image processing methods has been studied extensively in the last three decades. Out of the various algorithms developed, the Newton-Raphson partial differential correction method is the best performing quality-wise and most widely used in practical applications despite its higher computational cost. The work presented in this paper improves the original algorithm by including adaptive spatial regularization in the minimization process… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2010, Cofaru et al [42] improved the accuracy of DIC technique in measuring the displacement and the strain fields of a structural component subjected to low and high spatial frequency variations. In their work, they proposed an adaptive spatial regularization in which the details of neighbouring movements were analysed and processed, so that the movements of selected subsets were accurately estimated.…”
Section: Improvement Of 2d-dic Algorithms Regarding Their Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, Cofaru et al [42] improved the accuracy of DIC technique in measuring the displacement and the strain fields of a structural component subjected to low and high spatial frequency variations. In their work, they proposed an adaptive spatial regularization in which the details of neighbouring movements were analysed and processed, so that the movements of selected subsets were accurately estimated.…”
Section: Improvement Of 2d-dic Algorithms Regarding Their Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, this consists in the optimization of a similarity criterion that penalizes pixel differences between the two images, considering a pre-defined displacement model. This can be done either locally [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], using rectangular image regions, also called subsets, or globally [14][15][16] across the entire image. Strain data is subsequently obtained either directly from the displacement field components or through the differentiation of the displacement field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent advances aimed at improving displacement and strain accuracy, DIC lacks an approach that seeks to limit the influence of the various sources of measurement errors in an unified and effective way. If some problematic areas, such as image intensity variations [18,19], image noise [9], displacement discontinuities [11,12] or measurements near the edges of specimens [10,20], individually received attention in literature, others such as the presence of occlusions or localized image artefacts due to strong reflections or shadows, were not discussed. One of the main reasons for the apparent fragmentation in DIC solutions is the fact that current DIC methods optimize quadratic similarity criteria associated with the subset intra-pixel differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to methods for patterning objects for the purpose of DIC measurements, methods for characterizing the resulting patterns [9,10,11] and for choosing the analysis parameters in function of the characteristics of the pattern [12,13] or in function of the strain field [14] have been proposed. However, questions remain about the reliability of DIC measurements, in terms of spatial resolution, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and robustness of the measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%