“…Similarly, a nanoantenna operating as a transmitter makes it possible to detect nearby particles (e.g., located in its terminal) from far zone, which can be useful in a plethora of applications, such as bio-sensing. Although most (particularly earlier) studies on nanoantennas have investigated relatively simple geometries, such as bowtie, 1 , 2 , 8 , 10 monopole/dipole, 4 , 6 , 12 , 23 , 28 disk (or its inversion, i.e., hole), 7 , 38 sphere, 16 as well as their arrays (e.g., Yagi-Uda structures), 11 , 13 , 15 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 36 , 37 mainly considering restrictions in experimental setups, relatively complex shapes (e.g., fractal, 3 cross-shaped, 21 flower-shaped, 26 spiral, 27 horn-shaped, 31 tapered, 33 log-periodic, 34 , 35 and combinations with other nanostructures 32 ) have also been studied. In fact, besides the basic material, 19 , 20 geometry is one of the most important factors for the performance of a nanoantenna, 29 and new advances in nanoscale fabrication techniques encourage researchers to resort alternative shapes, which can demonstrate desired capabilities (in terms of bandwidth, directivity, field enhancement, etc.)…”