2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved multi-level protein–protein interaction prediction with semantic-based regularization

Abstract: BackgroundProtein–protein interactions can be seen as a hierarchical process occurring at three related levels: proteins bind by means of specific domains, which in turn form interfaces through patches of residues. Detailed knowledge about which domains and residues are involved in a given interaction has extensive applications to biology, including better understanding of the binding process and more efficient drug/enzyme design. Alas, most current interaction prediction methods do not identify which parts of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By applying a linear combination of the energy score, interface propensity, and residue conservation score, Liang et al [ 24 ] achieved decent coverage and accuracy. Zhang et al focused their effort on the interface conservation across structure space [ 25 ], while Saccà et al introduced multilevel (protein, domain, and residue) binding recognition using the Semantic Based Regularization Machine Learning framework [ 26 ]. It was shown that the three-dimensional structural information, either based on data from PDB [ 27 ] or obtained from homology modeling, produces a robust and efficient prediction of protein-protein interactions when applied with information on structural neighbors of queried proteins and Bayesian classifiers [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying a linear combination of the energy score, interface propensity, and residue conservation score, Liang et al [ 24 ] achieved decent coverage and accuracy. Zhang et al focused their effort on the interface conservation across structure space [ 25 ], while Saccà et al introduced multilevel (protein, domain, and residue) binding recognition using the Semantic Based Regularization Machine Learning framework [ 26 ]. It was shown that the three-dimensional structural information, either based on data from PDB [ 27 ] or obtained from homology modeling, produces a robust and efficient prediction of protein-protein interactions when applied with information on structural neighbors of queried proteins and Bayesian classifiers [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They constructed a classifier allowing for the information flow between the above three levels to improve the final prediction. This approach was further developed by Saccà et al (2014) , who introduced a different model of knowledge integration, and demonstrated its superiority on the previously used benchmarking data. Reported AUC values reached 0.80 for residues, 0.96 for domains and 0.82 for proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene locations were obtained from SGD; γ was set to 1. (ii) Similarly, protein complexes offer (noisy and incomplete) evidence about protein–protein interactions [22, 38]. We incorporated this information through a diffusion kernel K complex ( p,p ′ ) over the catalogue of yeast protein complexes [39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the interaction predicate works on pairs of proteins, and thus requires a kernel between protein pairs . Following Saccà et al [22], we computed the pairwise kernel K pairwise (( p,p ′ ),( q,q ′ )) from the aggregate kernel K ( p,p ′ ) as follows: The pairwise kernel was also normalized and preconditioned.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation